The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:20, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alistair Armand Vigier[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deleted on 28 April 2017, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alistair Vigier. Can't imagine he is suddenly so much more notable. Edwardx (talk) 00:57, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete He is a marketing person for a small law firm. A listing in a local "30 under 30" article does not confer notability, and the coverage is of the "local boy makes good" variety. Consensus only a few months ago was to delete, and all that has changed is that his middle name was used to create a new article. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 01:14, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Another biography of the Investor Relations Manager at HART Legal. The article makes no claim to encyclopaedic notability and the coverage provided and found is local and mundane. No reason to overturn the April consensus to delete. AllyD (talk) 07:20, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:22, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no credible claim or evidence of notability. PK T(alk) 18:38, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete helping to create the first law firm franchise in Canada is not enough for notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:39, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.