The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 16:48, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I started this article. The passage in WP:WEB about being hosted in a reliable, independent medium was specifically made to include Keenspot (I was told by an editor who was involved). This ia a former Keenspot comic. A few people have recently been making noise about a consensus that Keenspot no longer counts, but haven't mentioned where and when this happened.
This bit of whining aside, the article has a much more serious problem in verifiability. I don't suppose anyone knows where we could look for sources to fix it? --Kizor 20:03, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. "One decent RS" suggested above is neither decent nor RS. It's just a website without a reputation for fact-checking or accuracy. Sharksaredangerous (talk) 22:27, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.