- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Djurgårdens IF. (non-admin closure) Armbrust The Homunculus 11:50, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Alberget 4A (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This was created, deleted under WP:G11, and the deletion contested at Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2014_April_15. Per the DRV, I'm listing this here as an administrative action to get a clear consensus on whether the article should be deleted. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:39, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, this article was speedy deleted with reference to WP:G11, which says articles should not be promotion. The user who speedy deleted it has not been able to explain, what in the article it was which he deemed to be promotion. The article is not written for promotional purposes. Bandy boy (talk) 00:12, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Djurgårdens IF. The beer isn't independently notable. Most of the sources are to sites linked to the sports club; the Aftonbladet article is an independent source about brewing, but doesn't actually mention the beer by name. There are a few other references on blogs, directories of beers, etc, but they don't meet WP:GNG. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:46, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Aftonbladet is the largest newspaper in Sweden and is mentioning the beer by its former name, which was still the name it had by then. Bandy boy (talk) 12:30, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge or delete. I am leaning towards merge but it definitely does not meet the WP:GNG as there is no significant coverage in independent sources so at the very least it should be merged. -DJSasso (talk) 11:59, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge or delete. Not an individually notable product. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 03:36, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable by any reasonable standards. The beer is likely a rebadge of an existing beer, as is standard in these promotional cases. Beers named after sports clubs or even players are common, and while supporters of such clubs may be excited to have a beer named after their club or favourite, it is simply a marketing exercise to get the supporters to buy the beer, and is not in itself notable. SilkTork ✔Tea time 08:42, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep You can't base a delete vote on what might be "likely". Pågen Grip (talk) 10:46, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.