The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 01:04, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
A lawyer with the usual list of impressive sounding credentials and achievements, but not so much more so than every other lawyer. No signs of any independent coverage about this lawyer. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:46, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Notwithstanding the voluminous list of references cited in the article, the Wikipedia-defined notability of the subject attorney looks fairly marginal, and will require careful review of the references to determine the outcome of this AfD. This appears to be a relatively close call. I also note that the two "keep" votes to date appear to be a single-purpose account (SPA) whose only contribution to Wikipedia is his comment above, and a second account that appears to be the subject himself. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 08:15, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]