The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:14, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alan Hirsch[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

May not meet notability guidelines (tagged as such since 2012). Most sources are written by the article's subject. Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!} 20:24, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 21:14, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 21:14, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 21:14, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Appears to meet WP:AUTHOR with his ideas that helped form the missional church movement. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:11, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- He appears to have published enough to be notable. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:17, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep this Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Frost (minister) recent discussion about his co-author may show some light on the reasons why he's notable.E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:14, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:NAUTHOR, and worldcat shows 1800 library holdings Atlantic306 (talk) 13:13, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, just a quick glance at Amazon and the reviews of his books gives a strong indication that he is well known. he would also have enough coverage in Christian media if we were to look. Karl Twist (talk) 14:16, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.