The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Speedy deleted by Callanecc, CSD G5: Created by a blocked user in violation of ban or block Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:41, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Akhuwat[edit]

Akhuwat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

passing mentions only and no-indepth coverage in the RS. I think it fails WP:COMPANY. Saqib (talk) 07:27, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 07:38, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 07:38, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep- Hi Saqib, Have you check ever what is this organization about? It has a vital part in Pakistan for poverty alleviation. Please look on these Pakistani Government websites which are mentioning there work.

• http://irg.punjab.gov.pk/node/94
• http://fatada.gov.pk/project/governor-fata-interest-free-loan-scheme/
• https://www.punjab.gov.pk/node/2386
• http://bisp.gov.pk/profile-of-dr-amjad-saqib/ (Founder of Akhuwat)
• https://punjab.gov.pk/node/2713
• https://www.punjab.gov.pk/node/2106
• http://www.cm.punjab.gov.pk/node/1387 (Approval of Akhuwat University)
• http://cmsmu.punjab.gov.pk/cm_selfemployment_scheme (Punjab Govt with Akhuwat Self-Employment Scheme)
• http://www.cm.punjab.gov.pk/node/2801 (Punjab Govt with Akhuwat Self-Employment Scheme)

News Coverage is already cited in the article. EShami (talk) 10:22, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

— Note to closing admin: EShami (talk • contribs) appears to have a close connection with the subject of the article being discussed.

An organization is considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, and independent secondary sources, not in government sources so please don't use government sources. So please don't violate WP:PRIMARY SOURCE by citing affiliated government sources which would obviously glorify anything about the topic - due to very same reason BISP page on Akhuwat unsurprisingly states "Akhuwat, world’s largest interest free microfinance program." Usage of gov sources Its also trigger COI and compromise the neutrality of the article. Also please note, Wikipedia:Existence ≠ Notability. --Saqib (talk) 12:03, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.