The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. - Bobet 22:34, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Air Force Amy[edit]

Non-notable Prostitute at various Nevada brothels, and very occasional spokeshooker on tabloid TV shows. What are really (self) promotional gigs don't make her notable, and article is almost entirely unverifiable. Delete. Monicasdude 18:04, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Obvious Keep: Been on Stern show six times, an HBO series and Insomniac with Dave Attell - all of which are national (or maybe international?) broadcasts. I could find 50 less-notable people here without breaking a sweat (just by looking through nom.'s past Keep votes). Don't confuse morality with notability - this person may have been on the televisions of millions of people as many as a dozen times. Idea that self-promotional national gigs don't make her notable is silly - every guest on every late-night talk show is doing self-promo. And I've verified several things about the article with little trouble. —Wknight94 (talk) 18:34, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep as notable hussy. — Adrian~enwiki (talk) 19:25, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per wknight94. Kappa 13:43, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per wknight94. Jeff Silvers 02:58, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Obvious Keep Agree with all that wknight94 had to say, especially not confusing morality with notability..I mean truly we'd be hard pressed to have any names on Wiki if that were the case. This profession will someday be legal all over the planet, trailblazers..albeit Amy is not the first by a long shot..should indeed be noted. It's quite possible "The Moonlite Bunny Ranch," et al, is something historians will look back on if conducting a search for legal American Brothels, so why not feature some of its more colorful ladies. --Maryblackchurch 21:34, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.