The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Speedy keep per WP:Speedy keep#1. The nominator has withdrawn their nomination and there are no remaining arguments for deletion. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:27, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agroindustrial Casa Grande[edit]

Agroindustrial Casa Grande (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage per WP:CORP. SL93 (talk) 16:12, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:20, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:20, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Peru-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:20, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I suspect regional viewpoint. —¿philoserf? (talk) 11:20, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Withdraw: I see that enough coverage was added from a subscription service. I would like to withdraw this. SL93 (talk) 04:40, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.