The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 10:54, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Adrian Mak[edit]

Adrian Mak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This seems an obvious hoax to me, even though it has been around for almost two years. Grahame (talk) 11:28, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 11:28, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Information about this guy's greatness and eminence in the world of science is unverified. Reliable references were requested a year and a half ago, but none were found. Delete.--Lester 11:35, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:17, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Lester. Ottre 15:56, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as a likely hoax. Unverifiable. Moondyne 09:15, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.