The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:44, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adam J. Bass[edit]

Adam J. Bass (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Thinly veiled wp:spip of a routine lawyer — "500 Most Influential People In L.A." by bizjournals is not notability. Fails wp:sigcov as substantiated on interviews, business/alum pages, trivial mentions. Vanity Fair article is wp:blp1e if that and a cursory News search found his commentary in a Law.com article on "'Generational Changes,' 'Emphasis on Culture' Drive Buchalter, Leader Says". Bleak SunnyLetO (talk) 22:27, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Businesspeople. SunnyLetO (talk) 22:27, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:03, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above, especially lack of WP:SIGCOV. Appearing on a list of 500 top kinds of people in one metro area is the very definition of common. I add in that he fails my own test for lawyers. Managing a law firm can make you well-off, but not notable. Bearian (talk) 17:09, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete the Reuters source is a good one, but still cannot pass WP:THREE.Contributor892z (talk) 21:16, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Just an article of a business executive that lacks SIGCOV. Appearing as "500 Most Influential People in L.A." is not a major award for WP:ANYBIO and the listed company is nowhere near WP:NCORP. For now, the sources doesn't meet reserving or telling us what he has done especially the last one talking about "charting" which is not even a majority for WP:ONE EVENT. Delete till it meets WP:GNG! All the Best! Otuọcha (talk) 12:35, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.