The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Notability can be established to satisfy WP:RLN. (non-admin closure) Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:55, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Hayden[edit]

Adam Hayden (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG Jenyire2 19:33, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Jenyire2 19:33, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete a non-notable rugby player.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:22, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The guy played 27 first grade games in the NRL. Surely that's enough to pass WP:SPORTSPERSON and WP:GNG. 19:48, 23 February 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8003:24B7:4000:5D76:5EA4:994A:22E8 (talk)
• Keep - Passes WP:RLN. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:08, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong keep. Clearly meets WP:RLN. Have also added another IRS. Cabrils (talk) 23:18, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - clearly passes WP:RLN. @Johnpacklambert: perhaps you need to reconsider your !vote? Deus et lex (talk) 00:31, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.