The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nom Withdrawn. (Despite being involved I see no issue with closing a withdrawn afd), (non-admin closure) –Davey2010 • (talk) 15:50, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ace and the Ragers[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not comply with notability for musical groups. Only self website and social website sources are not enough for general notability guidelines. (Note: My first trial of proposing an AfD. I hope I did not make any technical or evaluation mistake. My PROD's generally work.) Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 10:52, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. Not a lot found online, but there's a brief bio and review from Allmusic ([1], [2]) and a review from CMJ New Music Report. Also a CMJ chart placing ([3]). Given that the band started in 1993 there may be more coverage in print sources than can be found online. --Michig (talk) 12:29, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:38, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:38, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 22:30, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, §FreeRangeFrog^croak 02:11, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I'm not sure what you're missing, but there seems to be plenty of mentions of the band's name on google. Yes, not a lot of prose, but mp3, posters, charts, albums for sale. They are not the non entity portrayed above. Trackinfo (talk) 02:56, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the sources added to the article in the time since this was nominated. There does not appear to be a wealth of coverage, but reviews in Allmusic and CMJ are just enough to get over the hump. Gongshow talk 03:29, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The added sources make this meet minimum notability. SL93 (talk) 00:01, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 July 20. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 04:41, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources added by Hobbes Goodyear (Thanks Hobbes Goodyear). –Davey2010 • (talk) 15:10, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw nomination happily over the development of the article and the opinions of the Wikipedian colleagues. Thanks to all and regards. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 15:27, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.