The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete ck lostsword•T•C 23:34, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AbsoluteTelnet[edit]

AbsoluteTelnet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

There is no clear evidence of notability for this produce; creator removed tag but was unable to offer independent sources. FisherQueen (Talk) 04:10, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete for lack of assertion of notability. Someguy1221 05:58, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete. The article doesn't contain information that wouldn't fit in a table such as on Comparison of SSH clients or yet-nonexistant Comparison of telnet clients. The author does have a point that Comparison of SSH clients shouldn't have dead links, but that means the latter page should be de-wikified rather than that all dead links should be created as new articles. With evidence of notability, it would be weak keep. Han-Kwang 17:49, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There are plenty of Google hits, but most of them are auto-generated download pages. Searching for 'absolutetelnet ssh viewtopic' will give only 74 web forum pages where the program is discussed, while the same query for PuTTY or OpenSSH wil give over 20,000 hits. Han-Kwang 17:54, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 13:59, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.