The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Materialscientist (talk) 22:45, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Abrakadabr[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to verify or sustian article. Fails Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and WP:PROF. This article looks like it exists to expound and promote this person's theories. I can find no evidence that anyone is discussing him and the references appear to be citations within his theories rather than to reliable sources about him or his work. Jbh ^Talk 21:09, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Jbh ^Talk 21:10, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Jbh ^Talk 21:10, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. Jbh ^Talk 21:10, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Yemen-related deletion discussions. Jbh ^Talk 21:10, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No sources to be found. May change vote if they can be. Is this BLP a hoax? At best WP:Fringe. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:39, 10 October 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Speedy delete - Hoax. I am fairly certain this was speedily deleted yesterday as a hoax but created by a different editor?? Velella ^{Velella Talk} 22:09, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as hoax same article as recently created at GomerOzDubar. Copy at User:Lexington Kromwell/sandbox. Likely socks of User:Mollymaybach See WP:ANI#GomerOzDubar Hoax?. --Jules (Mrjulesd) 22:12, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note I tagged the article ((db-hoax)) per above. Jbh ^Talk 22:37, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.