The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 23:49, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aaron Seigo[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be notable by our standards. Of all the sources in the article, only one is acceptable as a secondary sources contributing to notability--this interview. A Google search delivers a few things like this and this, but these are not the kind of sources that add to notability. Almost all the other links in the article are to his employer. Drmies (talk) 15:38, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per WP:GNG - not enough third-party coverage out there to deem him noteworthy of a WP:BLP. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 15:44, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete we lack enough 3rd party independent sources to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:10, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Yup, not a resume pile. W Nowicki (talk) 18:42, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.