The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:37, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AGNIVEER[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable organisation. Most of the references are to its own website. Most of the others do not mention it. Google finds very few hits and nothng of significance. Disputed prod. noq (talk) 06:56, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Essay about the organization, sourced almost entirely to the organization's website(s). No evidence of notability. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 22:54, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:47, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 08:04, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence of notability. As FreeRangeFrog, an essay about subject filled with its own POV.--Vigyani_talk^{ਯੋਗਦਾਨ} 14:47, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.