The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy Delete. Deleted as part of mass deletion. [1] (non-admin closure) Jbh^Talk 02:23, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

9966[edit]

9966 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is not necessary, astronomical events can be placed on 100th century article CatcherStorm ^talk 18:50, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• I...umm...exactly how many of these articles are there? Follow up question: are any of them conceivably more useless, or are they all about the same in that regard? TimothyJosephWood 19:06, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per WP:NOTFUTURE, all the others as well. J947 00:46, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.