The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Wordsmith^Communicate 06:10, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

5600 (Hebrew year)[edit]

5600 (Hebrew year) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1st century (Hebrew) (2nd nomination) for my opinions on the matter. As they uncannily take up space in that previous AfD discussion, unlike before, I don't think enumerating the years will be necessary. They stretch from 5600 (Hebrew year)—5800 (Hebrew year) and also, for whatever reason, contain 4965 (Hebrew year), 5573 (Hebrew year), 5825 (Hebrew year), 5853 (Hebrew year), 5881 (Hebrew year), 5909 (Hebrew year), 5937 (Hebrew year), 5965 (Hebrew year), and 5993 (Hebrew year) as well. The relevant templates are Template:Hebrew-year-stub, Template:Description of a Hebrew year, Template:Month Hebrew calendar, Template:Month Hebrew calendar/Help, Template:Month Hebrew calendar - detailed, Template:Footer Hebrew calendar, Template:Category and navigation for a Hebrew year, and Template:Header Hebrew calendar. Like before, they contain no useful information, and are more like repositories of templates if anything. And finally, the categories are Category:Hebrew years and all relevant subcats.

Please delete all of them, so that I don't have to list them again. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 00:04, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all per nom. Bigtop みんな空の下 (トーク) 00:13, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all. - Vacuous placeholders. Carrite (talk) 00:51, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all per Carrite. Are you also nominating 5573 (Hebrew year) or any years over 5800? —Train2104 (talk · contribs · count · email) 01:29, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks train. I didn't see when looking through Special:WhatLinksHere... :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 01:37, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• There's also 5825, 5853, and 5881. —Train2104 (talk · contribs · count · email) 01:52, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.