The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎ . Per comments from established editors Star Mississippi 17:47, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

3Sun[edit]

3Sun (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources in Italian of English websites, and no in-depth coverage. Appears it doesn't pass WP NCROP Edit.pdf (talk) 07:57, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Italy. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:05, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. The Italian article at it:3Sun has some references that could be added here. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 10:00, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! There are no valid reasons to remove this page. The sources provided are relevant and independent, and the content and structure of the page adhere to Wikipedia's guidelines. 3Sun is also significant both nationally and internationally. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IvanPeschiani (talk • contribs) 15:02, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Eliminated orphanization and added authoritative and independent sources IvanPeschiani (talk) 15:01, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep on the basis of improvements to the article. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 07:45, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment :Keep I made some improvements on the Enel Green Power page and added a wikilink to 3sun. I also removed the orphan notice on the 3sun page and added more authoritative and independent sources, mainly in English and some in Italian. Do you have any other suggestions for what I should do next? Thanks. IvanPeschiani (talk) 11:50, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep The account Edit.pdf, which proposed the page's removal, doesn't have the authority to post notices of deletion without providing legitimate reasons. This account isn't contributing directly to the encyclopedia, and instead is only destroying the work of others and resources that are useful to users. This page should remain active! Derylams (talk) 11:10, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Derylams that is not a valid AFD rationale. Your statements also aren't in accordance with Wikipedia's fifth pillar. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:29, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles (talk) 14:17, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep What I’m referring to is the 3Sun page, which is authoritative, well done and full of information and sources. 3Sun is also an international company of the highest level, a joint venture of companies at the top of the international energy sector. So I just wanted to reiterate that it’s not fair to ask for removals in this inappropriate and senseless way.185.108.105.233 (talk) 09:31, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: Article needs more ce cleanup, but it passes GNG. See [1], [2], [3], [4]. I stopped looking after I found these, none of them are perfect, but they pass GNG.  // Timothy :: talk  04:58, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.