- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Katara Cultural Village. czar 17:39, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
21 High Street Doha[edit]
- 21 High Street Doha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Zero in-depth refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources. Was sent to draft in hopes of improvement, but returned to mainspace immediately without any. Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 12:29, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Per Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2023 January 19
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 22:10, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge I can see the logic behind doing this Elinruby (talk) 22:26, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete (oppose merger). The target article already includes this information, so there is nothing to merge. As far as deletion goes, this is not covered in depth in multiple independent sources, and since it is a business venture of Ali Bin Ali Holding, a mall, it would actually have to pass WP:NCORP, not simply GNG; this has several light-years of catching up to do in that regard. —Alalch E. 22:46, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Note that the actual name of this thing is '21 High st', not '21 High Street Doha'; I don't feel that a redirect at this name would be useful, so I support plain deletion. —Alalch E. 23:04, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- redirect as it's a reasonable search term since redirects are cheap. I'd be fine with a merge, but it really already has been. I've yet to see an argument about why a redirect is the wrong outcome here. Hobit (talk) 02:07, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Since we can have "21 High street" and "21 High st" as a redirects, which are vastly better, I feel like there would be no tangible benefit from "21 High Street Doha" —Alalch E. 02:41, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Katara Cultural Village As Alalch E. points out, there's nothing really to merge here. Still, it seems like a plausible search term, so a redirect feels like the most appropriate solution. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 02:08, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect and selective merge to Katara Cultural Village as a reasonable search term. I think the content that remains in the target page is a sufficient explanation for this topic, but I’ll leave that for editors with a more vested interest in this topic. Other equally reasonable search terms "21 High street" and "21 High st" already exist as redirects so it would make sense for this to be a redirect as well and therefore I oppose deletion. Frank Anchor 04:41, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Katara Cultural Village, do not delete. Fails WP:GEO per nom. Nothing to merge since content is already in the article. Name is a plausible search term. So a redirect doesn't hurt at all. SBKSPP (talk) 01:00, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.