- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. – Joe (talk) 13:22, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- 2023 Pan American Racquetball Championships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG. Sources such as this [1] are primary. Also per Wikipedia:NOTDATABASE. Contested prod. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 16:30, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Guatemala. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 16:30, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:18, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- KEEP - I was surprised this article was nominated for deletion, especially as the event in question is one of the qualifying events for the 2023 Pan American Games. The article details the latest edition of an annual international sporting event that's been happening for over three decades involving a sport recognized by the International Olympic Committee. It seems the lack of references is the basis for the nomination, so I've added references to the event most of which are in Spanish, as the winners were from Spanish speaking countries and it's usually the winners that make the press. Trb333 (talk) 03:57, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- keep for passing GNG. Pelmeen10 (talk) 22:27, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Covered by multiple secondary sources; I don't understand how it's supposed to fail sigcov or GNG. Actualcpscm (talk) 12:47, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Analysis of newly added references would be very helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seraphimblade Talk to me 14:23, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.