The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was SNOW delete see also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012 California earthquake. Jclemens (talk) 06:37, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2012 Las Vegas earthquake[edit]

2012 Las Vegas earthquake (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:CRYSTAL that uses a science-fiction movie as its academic referencing. Warrah (talk) 02:57, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge This article is supposed to deal with a movie scene from the movie 2012. If it cannot be a standalone article, it should be merged with the main movie title. The same goes with 2012 California earthquake. GVnayR (talk) 03:02, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. We don't have articles about individual film scenes, not matter how earthshaking (and this one doesn't come close to qualifying).Clarityfiend (talk) 03:08, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Then I suggest that you either merge or redirect this individual film scene into the main film article. GVnayR (talk) 03:23, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Reply. There's nothing worth merging IMO, and it makes an unlikely search string. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:34, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. If by some chance the movie plot element is notable enough to have an article- and I don't think it is- it shouldn't be at this title, which is of the format used for real events. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 03:44, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- Bradjamesbrown (talk) 03:44, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete non-notable element of a boring film. 65.94.253.16 (talk) 04:45, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.