The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 18:37, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2005 in Hot 100[edit]

this is just a list of #1 songs from 2005, which hasn't been expanded since created a year ago. It's redundant information already provided in Hot 100 number-one hits of 2005 (United States) Wolfer68 (talk) 07:05, 21 June 2008 (UTC) I am also nominating the following related pages because of similar existing articles:[reply]

Delete Redundant to information in Hot 100 number-one hits of 2005 (United States) and the other articles posted above. Also 2007 in Hot 100 and 2008 in Hot 100 are similar articles created by the same user Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 23:24, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect all as redundant --T-rex 02:57, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:03, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Caldorwards4 (talk) 02:57, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment shouldn't 2007 in Hot 100 and 2008 in Hot 100 be nominated too? --Caldorwards4 (talk) 02:59, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.