The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^{talk to me} 05:31, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1XR[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In 2006, the developers let leak that they were going to make the coolest racing game ever and then promptly disappeared. I couldn't find any reliable sources on the subject, only a short press release. Odie5533 (talk) 04:31, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This vaporware has been non-existent for over five years. It is hard to imagine how it could be less notable. The only surprise is that their 2006 website is still up, promising hot news "shortly". I guess they pre-paid their host. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 04:46, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Clearly not notable, despite having a comprehensive upgrade tree. Moswento (talk | contribs) 10:21, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as violates WP:VGSCOPE clauses 1 and 8. Unfortunately for this article, WP:UPGRADETREE (Any videogame, living person or wombat claiming to possess an upgrade tree of advanced comprehensivity is considered of highest notability) is a policy existing only in my twisted mind. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 19:28, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.