The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. delete, the one merge suggestion didn't go anywhere Nja²⁴⁷ 10:56, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

19th Studio Album (Rush)[edit]

WP:CRYSTAL - no reliable sources speak about this album as of yet Wisdom89 _{(_T / ^C)} 02:47, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Wisdom89 _{(_T / ^C)} 02:51, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: WP:BALL talks about events, but that guideline can be applied to albums as well... speculation about it must be well documented, which I think is album-related too. So far my Google searching only turns up one link ([1]), and I think this does not constitute 'well documented'. Additionally, you could also take a look at WP:HAMMER, about un-named albums. JulieSpaulding (talk) 03:52, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Above result refers to Rush's 18th album, Snakes & Arrows, not to the possible 19th. ThuranX (talk) 04:41, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete with a crystal hammer. Also, per Rush discography, they already have 19 studio albums; any new one would be a 20th. Only reference is an interview with Alex Lifeson, and he can talk about what they plan to do, but he certainly can't guarantee that an album will be released. Nosleep ^{break my slumber} 07:01, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. An album that might be recorded at some point in the future shouldn't have an article here.--Michig (talk) 07:16, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NALBUMS and WP:HAMMER. Wikipedia is not a fan rumour site. JohnCD (talk) 09:34, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
merge to the band's page- For the record, there is a cited source on the band's page that shows that they ARE planning on going back into the studio sometime this fall (I think). But since they haven't even gone into the studio yet, there's no need for an article. Oh, and as a fan, I'd like to slap the writer of the article for so badly jumping the gun. Umbralcorax (talk) 14:54, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:HAMMER, and once again I will never understand why the slobbering fanboys are in such a big freaking hurry to get out an album article the nanonsecond they hear the first rumor about the next album. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 19:31, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as the editor who nom'd it as A7, which needs serious adjsutment to allow albums and other future nonsense. 10lbHammer - Wikipedia is a race, of course. ThuranX (talk) 21:21, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If I had a hammer → I'd hammer in the morning → I'd hammer in the evening → All over this land → I'd hammer out DANGER! → I'd hammer out a warning → I'd hammer out love between my brothers and my sisters → Aaaaaaaaaaaaallllllllllll over this land!!!! MuZemike 23:49, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, that is. MuZemike 23:49, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per WP:CRYSTAL. Rlendog (talk) 15:09, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, If not even Rush themselves know anything definite about this album, how on Earth can we have a Wikipedia article about it. Astronaut (talk) 06:02, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.