The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Internet top-level domains. (non-admin closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:29, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

.lighting[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An irrelevant domain. A merge with a list of all top level domains could be good. Staglit (talk) 00:12, 22 April 2014 (UTC) Staglit (talk) 00:12, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There's hundreds of TLDs, most with little or no media coverage. Possibly we need a debate over whether they should be listed somewhere but a separate article is totally inappropriate. --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:10, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Internet top-level domains until evidence is shown of meeting WP:N -- The Anome (talk) 18:20, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:49, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to list. No independent notability in a search engine test. Best kept in list until sources show. Before you nominate to AfD, might be worth discussing merge options on the article talk pages. czar ♔ 16:04, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Internet top-level domains as not notable for a standalone article. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 17:04, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.