That said, having gone through the vast majority of the questions, there is a clear thread that is worthy of general comment - the question of transparency, what goes on on the mailing list, and private evidence. Clearly this is an issue of grave community concern. As I am not an arbitrator, I do not know what goes on on the arbcom mailing list. I do not know the details on any private cases. I know that arbitrators I trust and respect have participated in the current system, and I would be very surprised to find malfeasance or corruption. On the other hand, the community concern is undeniable.
All I can say on this matter is that, without full knowledge of the facts, I am unwilling to draw conclusions about current practice. However, if elected, I will look seriously at the issue, look seriously at the community concerns, and do what I can to address them. I will enter the committee with an open mind, and will look at these issues with fresh eyes. I can't promise change without knowing all the facts, but I can promise that I will thoroughly investigate the situation and come to a careful conclusion about it that keeps in mind community concern.