ZimZalaBim is trying to take a short wikibreak and will be back on Wikipedia soon. Most likely, however, ZimZalaBim will not be able to keep away from Wikipedia for that long, and will probably be back a lot earlier while making some small edits every once in a while anyway.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12

Hello ZimZalaBim You changed my edit of the term "Russian Aggression" into "pro-russian turmoils". I have read your "philosophy" here and think your change is not according to it. In delicate topics as ongoing conflicts, its even more important to use a value-free, neutral language, above all in a dictionary. The term "russian aggression" expresses the perception of one side of the conflict and is not even used in well-searched conflicts of the past. In political science, there are only a few articles what even use those terms (" Language of Political Aggression" by David Matsumoto, 2013) and are in another context. The text itself goes further to the blame of pro-russian separatists and the month may 2014 is coined by the Odesa clashes, independent scientific based historical research of the events, the involvement of foreign powers, have to be done in the upcoming decades. When it comes to the invasion in 2022, the use of the term "russian aggression" can be argueably used (should be avoided as outlined), but clearly not in 2014. I think this is not how Wiki should handle it and hope you understand my change better now. Best regards from Switzerland, Fabio — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fabio Rüegsegger (talk • contribs) 12:31, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I assume you are talking about this edit by an unregistered user, which was reverted two different times. I suggest making your argument on the article's talk page, which is where content discussions should take place. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 17:59, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Carter G. Woodson Middle School. I do not think that Carter G. Woodson Middle School fits the speedy deletion criterion R3 because it does not apply to articles and stubs that have been converted into redirects. If you wish, you may try using the full redirects for discussion (RfD) process instead. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 18:45, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Saw that, and didn't notice that aspect of the policy. Appreciate the note. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 18:47, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]