Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Natalie Wood, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by tool called ClueBot NG.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "((helpme))" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Natalie Wood was changed by Wwwaa1234 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.86516 on 2011-11-22T00:46:48+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:46, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Natalie Wood. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Such large content removals should be discussed on the article talk page first. And please do not turn this into an edit war. Thanks. Lhb1239 (talk) 00:54, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Natalie Wood shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Lhb1239 (talk) 00:55, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been reported for edit warring and violating 3RR at the Edit Warring Noticeboard as a result of your continued edits at Natalie Wood. This is a courtesy notice. You may read the details and comment here. Lhb1239 (talk) 01:35, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]