Hi Warlime! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:31, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Ferratum Group.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:05, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Warlime. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place ((helpme)) on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Joseph2302 (talk) 12:13, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that all your edits have been to Ferratum Group. As a result, I was wondering if you work for, on behalf of the company- if you do, then you are strongly advised to read Wikipedia's conflict of interest policies, WP:COI. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:16, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have read the policy thank you. Warlime (talk) 12:18, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So that's a yes you are affiliated to them? Please could you state your affiliation. Are you an employee of the company, or are you being paid specifically to create this article for them? If you were paid to create the article, I urge you to declare it, in accordance with our our Terms of Use, particularly those dealing with paid contributions without disclosure. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:27, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I am affiliated with them, I guess I didn't read the policy well enough. Warlime (talk) 14:19, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:39, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Warlime. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

• Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
• Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
• Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Brianhe (talk) 16:59, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Brianhe: This seems like an adequate disclosure, they're a company employee. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:11, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to emphasize that it's an ongoing requirement to disclose every COI contribution. Declaring this on the article's talkpage with the ((Connected contributor)) template is the best way to do this. Or to simply not edit the article directly, but discuss suggested changes on the talkpage. — Brianhe (talk) 17:16, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I already tagged the talkpage with the connected contributor template. But I agree, the best way is not to directly edit the article. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:20, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Warlime, you disclosed here that you are an employee. Would you please add that disclosure to your Userpage User:Warlime? All this is needed is something simple like, "I am employee of Ferratum Group, which provides microloans on mobile devices" Also, would you please agree to not edit content directly about Ferratum going forward but instead use the edit request feature? Then we can wrap this thread up. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 12:06, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Ok will do. Warlime (talk) 12:11, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ferratum Group is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ferratum Group until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:31, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]