Hello, I'm Greyjoy. I noticed that you recently removed content from Afterlife without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Greyjoy talk 10:46, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Meaning of life, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Schazjmd (talk) 17:37, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Criticism of the Quran, you may be blocked from editing. Notfrompedro (talk) 17:50, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for your recent additions in the article, but some of the info are repeated stuff (that the Kural follows Dharmic religion in the Purushartha divisions) and the section is largely unreliable (either unsourced or poorly sourced with sorces not fitting WP:RS (such as YaazhTamil). So have removed them now. Nevertheless, the section is an interesting one; we need reliable sources for every claim. Have noted these for future addition but please find good sources before that. Thanks. Rasnaboy (talk) 05:09, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for your message.
I'll quote from authentic sources and restore my edit.
My primary source is the text itself therefore it cannot be unreliable. It will be better if you quote which of my information is unreliable or unfactual. Vigneshvvickyv0 (talk) 09:05, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Rasnaboy (talk) 17:42, 30 November 2022 (UTC)