This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
You were released from your interaction ban with DarknessShines just a few days ago, under the expectation that you would go concentrate on content editing, engage in constructive discussion with DS on the mediation, and be otherwise on your absolute best behaviour. Today, you saw fit to join in the editing of that miserable "WP:Sockophobia" essay, under its previous name that made it absolutely clear that it was directed at DS and his issues with the Nangparbat harasser. Your edits to it involved the addition of a long list of "symptoms", which, under these circumstances, can only be read as veiled accusations against DS.
I really, really, really can't see how you could possibly believe that was a good idea in your situation. I have blocked you for another week. (Note that I had this block decided and this message typed out before I saw your latest posting on my talkpage.) Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:16, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
TopGun/Archives/2012 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I did not create it and none of my contributions to that essay related to DS, rather to issues in general. Feel free to check. The list was not against DS at all. Read the list and compare it with what WP:DBQ says. It is just an elaboration of that! If you can still not see good faith on my part, see that I was the one who moved it to the neutral title WP:Sockophobia. So, basically I participate in a developing essay, get stalked there by DS (that's how he got there) and when he nominated it at MFD, I change the essay to a neutral title from one that I did not add and I'm blocked. Excellent. --lTopGunl (talk) 11:19, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You are not going to get yourself unblocked by continuing to make accusations against DS. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:50, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
TopGun/Archives/2012 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I did not make any accusation against DS in my unblock request. I did say that there's no other way that he could have gotten to that page other than reading my contributions (or probably SMS's), but when that happens in my case, I still stay away from his articles. He did not and I reported DS for that before I posted that unblock request or even before I got blocked and that is not related to my block, so I don't see how that reason stands for the decline? I simply edited an essay about every one calling all new editors socks and I was the one who moved it away from the one pointing to DS. See the last request. [1] [2] - this was a poor block. --lTopGunl (talk) 17:53, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you poke a bear, do not be surprised when you are growled at. The essay was clearly aimed at another editor with whom you have been involved in many conflicts, in the past, so much so that a now-revoked interaction ban had to be imposed between the two of you. As such, your actions were incredibly ill-advised and could be perceived as inflammatory by a reasonable person. It is for these reasons that I find this block sound and am therefore upholding it. Salvio Let's talk about it! 07:09, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
TopGun/Archives/2012 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
My actions were moving it to a neutral status evidently (with the diff given above) and not starting it. --lTopGunl (talk) 07:14, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
That's not the point. Declined, as request does not address the reasons for the block. Hersfold non-admin(t/a/c) 20:30, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
((unblock|1=I did not get the last decline at all. I was blocked because I contributed to that essay... that ''is'' the reason for the block being addressed that my contributions to the essay were positive and moved it to a neutral state. See last two requests. Also, why am I blocked for a week straight away. All the previous related blocks were not correct and reverted. My blocks for editwar have not been repeated either after the 1RR sanction back in feb. My block log is as such clean and this is improper escalation. --lTopGunl (talk) 07:35, 30 June 2012 (UTC)))
Is it Nangaparbat? Same location, same topic area. --SMS Talk 18:02, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
I may sound a little rude but your username is similar to a banned user: User:Top Gun. ༆ (talk) 19:51, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi I'm 28 years old, i'm a new wikipedia user, I have a cognitive condition that I don't want to specify, but you please be mentor to help me use wikipedia? WP:ADOPT thanks. Narwhalgal84 (talk) 02:30, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
There is a proposal by Darkness Shines of an example to work on. [4] Would you be willing to work on this? Alternatively, you could propose an alternate example, or examples. Sunray (talk) 20:35, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi! Of course I do not mind discussing it in the talk page. I found the talk page discussion was rather a discussion between you and Vaibhav Jain on wiki behavior than a discussion on the topic! See you there.--Dwaipayan (talk) 17:30, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
You have broken your 1r restrict ion on Partition of India. Please self revert. Darkness Shines (talk) 18:45, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration clarification. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification#Amendment request: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
Thanks, Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:12, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
i would like you to comment on this thread on my talk page. [6]-- altetendekrabbe 08:10, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
I made some changes to the page (and some to the Talk page) of the above article. Since you appear to be a major contributor to the article, I thought I will post about it here so you can take a look. Piyush (talk) 10:02, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
Do you know how to save a game after it is completed; am I allowed to create a sub-sub page to archive a game? Ankh.Morpork 15:26, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
I've asked you a question here. Would you be able to respond? Sunray (talk) 15:10, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
I have initiated a discussion here. Since you are an experienced editor who was involved on the page, I am inviting you to contribute to it. Thanks! Anir1uph (talk) 05:39, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Mar4d (talk) 04:20, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pakistan Zindabad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pakistan Zindabad until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DBigXray 15:46, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Barnstar by User:Justice007 copied to user page. --lTopGunl (talk) 14:18, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
An appreciation Barnstar | |
An appreciation barnstar in recognition of your all past and for future work on Wikipedia. Justice007 (talk) 15:40, 24 July 2012 (UTC) |
FYI. [7]. --regentspark (comment) 19:02, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
Good to go! --SMS Talk 08:09, 27 July 2012 (UTC)