Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dieting with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Deadly∀ssassin 04:13, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nutrition with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. RandomStringOfCharacters [T] 06:51, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Nutrition, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Nutrition was changed by Tomcorsonknowles (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.853635 on 2011-09-15T06:03:38+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:03, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Healthy diet, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 06:11, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Considering that all your edits have been quickly reverted by numerous editors, I think it should be fairly clear to you by now that repeatedly adding your podcasts to Wikipedia articles is not appropriate. If you continue to edit contrary to consensus like this, you will be blocked from editing. Deli nk (talk) 13:02, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Epigenetics, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Epigenetics was changed by Tomcorsonknowles (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.912252 on 2011-09-19T04:59:37+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:59, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Allergy with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tuvok[^T@lk/_Improve] 05:00, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest policy and notability guidelines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)), but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. - Barek (talk • contribs) - 05:39, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for an additional week. I recommend you discuss what you wish to do and get consensus on your talk page before readding your pod casts. Thanks Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:39, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is important to get consensus to add the content in question before re adding it. If you agree to do this I will unblock your account. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:48, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]