|
Hi Teh hackz0r! I added (20:47, 23 June 2012) a paragraph in the section "Allegations of Nazism" which you removed as "unencyclopedic" (11:06, 24 June 2012). It would be great if you could explain why you removed it. Black Hole GR (talk) 11:27, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
I removed it because it was not written in an encyclopedic manner (see MOS:NOTED). If you reformulate it in neutral language, I have no objections against it. Regards Teh hackz0r (talk) 11:44, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello Teh hackz0r.
I see that you have made some comments in relation to the above article, comments which I think are relevant to the situation at hand, so I am contacting you to request any input you may be able to contribute.
The situation at hand is that I made what I felt were some basic edits, and they were repeatedly deleted by a contributor, even after I made an adjustment.
I am basically new to this scenario, so I hadn't been aware of the Talk page, etc. At any rate, I have been reading the talk page, and the content of my edit had already been largely addressed by other contributors, including yourself.
So, since I am tackling the deplorable state of the article in question and intend to do a significant edit, I would like to try and build a little consensus, and the more the merrier in the that process!
I would appreciate it if you could take the time to read through the recent entries on the Talk page and participate in the course of events leading to as substantial an edit as possible.