This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 |
Would you please unclose the discussion? The admin who deleted the image does not appear to have reviewed it and closing it makes it look as though that is what occurred. I have asked that admin to look over the discussion.--The Devil's Advocate tlk. cntrb. 14:06, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
One question, does your close of the discussion mean that you endorse the deletion because you agree that it violates non-free use policy, or merely that you acknowledge that it has been speedly deleted it by Ronhjones per F7? Diego (talk) 14:37, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
Reference your Wikipedia:Files_for_upload#La_Salle_Catholic_College on hold status, apparently a fair-use graphic was put up, see here thumb RegistryKey (talk) 21:04, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
In one month's time, we will know our WikiCup 2014 champion. Newcomer Godot13 (submissions) has taken a strong lead with a featured list (historical coats of arms of the U.S. states from 1876) and a raft of featured pictures. Reigning champion Cwmhiraeth (submissions) is in second place with a number of high-importance biology articles, including new FA Isopoda and new GA least weasel. Casliber (submissions), who is in his fifth WikiCup final, is in third, with featured articles Pictor and Epacris impressa.
Signups for the 2015 WikiCup are open. All Wikipedians, new and experienced, are warmly invited to sign up for the competition. Wikipedians interested in friendly competition may also like to sign up for the GA Cup, a new WikiCup-inspired competition which revolves around completing good article reviews. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk · contribs) The ed17 (talk · contribs) and Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 22:11, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
I know it's been a good long while (I don't really keep up with things on here anymore), but I'm a little disappointed that this image ended up being deleted. I originally uploaded it as a fair use image for the article Altcar Bob, it was another user who changed it to a PD license which is what led to the deletion discussion. It was my hope that the image could have been retained under the fair use license I originally gave it - is there any possibility of having it restored on that basis? Small-town hero (talk) 13:09, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Is the FBI logo copyrightable, is the USMS, the ATF logo? Huh?
Hopper1010 (talk) 09:54, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, that post was written in rage. I didn't quite understand the "verdict" so to speak. Mind explaining to me? Hopper1010 (talk) 13:02, 14 October 2014 (UTC) Just now I spotted a law that if the author of the material died more than 70 years ago, it wouldn't be copyrightable. Now, the star was made sometime in the 1920s or 1930s, by man called Björn Björnsson. I haven't been able to find any information on him (http://www.logreglan.is/displayer.asp?cat_id=435). He designed the star at the order of the Police Chief Hermanns Jónassonar (1928-1934). What do you think? Hopper1010 (talk) 13:38, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
Another thing; it's been 84 years since the star was released; the copyright act wasn't out then; nor was there a "Republic of Iceland". It was Denmark. Iceland was apart of Denmark. "Article 44: "In the case of a work which has not been presented, by an unknown author, copyright shall expire after 70 years have elapsed from the end of the year of its creation.]1)"
Article 6 When a work, or parts of works, by one or more authors, are incorporated into a composite work, which may be in itself considered to be a literary or artistic work, the person creating the composite work shall hold copyright thereto. His right shall in no way affect copyright to the works incorporated into the composite work. The provisions of the first paragraph shall not apply to newspapers and periodicals, cf. Article 40. [The provisions of the first paragraph shall apply to databases, with regard to their selection and arrangement, provided general conditions for copyright protection have been satisfied. This shall not affect the copyright to any works which may be included in the database. Nor shall it affect the parallel rights of producers in accordance with Article 50.
A database, as referred to in this Act, cf. the third paragraph of this Article and Article 50, shall mean a collection of independent works, information or other details, which have been arranged in an organised or systematic fashion and are accessible by electronic means or by other methods. A computer program, which is used for the compilation or operation of a database and to which access is granted by electronic means, shall not be deemed a database for the purpose of this Act.
Here is proof; http://www.mbl.is/greinasafn/grein/726955/ (news). http://www.logreglan.is/displayer.asp?cat_id=435 (official police website).
Hopper1010 (talk) 14:01, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
You have deleted a photo that I posted on Henri Giraud, File:Giraud at Ft. Benning 1943.jpg. It was proposed for deletion on 10 October because I am not the photographer (he died in 1995). I followed instructions and revised the photo information, then sent permission to WP:OTRS. Why has the photo been deleted? I am the sole copyright owner and this photo has never appeared anywhere else. Can I appeal this decision? Cmacauley (talk) 14:57, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
Greetings! I noticed that you closed a WP:PUF discussion here - just wanted to point out there were a bunch of other files from the same source listed in that nomination that also require deletion. Thanks! With respect - Kelly hi! 23:57, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi, TLSuda. You deleted an image (File:Cec logo.svg) and stated here "The result of the discussion was: Delete". Could you please provide a link to that discussion upon which you based your decision to delete the image, or elaborate on your reason for the deletion? Regards, Xenophrenic (talk) 15:27, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Good Technology New Corporate Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:39, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I am of the opinion that you prematurely closed the discussion on my file or misinterpreted the argument and have referred it to Deletion Review at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2014 October 5
An editor has asked for a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review#File:PGA CBS 2014|deletion review]] of File:PGA CBS 2014. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.
UserGogo212121 Hello TLSuda please look this three page Link To License Information: http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/celebritymicro/images/id/5396/category/parties/type/view/imageid/2683885/
URL: http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/celebritymicro/images/id/171/category/parties/type/view/imageid/2683800/ --Gogo212121 (talk) 16:44, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
The 2014 WikiCup champion is Godot13 (submissions), who flew the flag of the Smithsonian Institution. This was Godot13's first WikiCup competition and, over the 10 months of the competition, he has produced (among other contributions) two featured lists and an incredible 292 featured pictures, including architectural photographs and scans of historical documents. Cwmhiraeth (submissions), 2012 and 2013 WikiCup champion, came in second, having written a large number of biology-related articles. Casliber (submissions), WikiCup finalist every year since 2010, finished in third.
A full list of our prize-winners follows:
Congratulations to everyone who has been successful in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and a particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have participated this year. We warmly invite all of you to sign up for next year's competition. Discussions and polls concerning potential rules changes are also open, and all are welcome to participate. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2014 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk · contribs) The ed17 (talk · contribs) and Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 22:51, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi, TLSuda. You deleted a portrait of Prince Katsura and stated that "The result of the discussion was: Delete". Could you please elaborate on your reason for the deletion? The previous version of the portrait depicted another person and was then removed, but the portrait I uploaded was correct, and it didn't seem to violate Wiki guidelines, since it's still available in Thai Wikipedia. Regards,ChengH (talk) 15:10, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello TLSuda. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to you in particular.
The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when hallmarks of copyvios in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered.
If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied from the draft, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the Wayback Machine is very useful for sussing that out.)
If you do find a copyright violation, please do not decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Wikipedia to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using ((db-g12|url=URL of source)). If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with ((subst:copyvio|url=URL of source)).
Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with weasel words; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors.
I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC).
Sent via--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Tropic Air logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:28, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello everyone, and may we wish you all a happy holiday season. As you will probably already know, the 2015 WikiCup begins in the new year; there is still time to sign up. We have a few important announcements concerning the future of the WikiCup.
If you have any questions or concerns, the judges can be reached on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, on their talk pages, or by email. We hope you will all join us in trying to make the 2015 WikiCup the most productive and enjoyable yet. You are receiving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk), The ed17 (talk), Miyagawa (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Figureskatingfan (talk) 18:53, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Note that the user is blocked (not for misbehavior, though) and thus won't be responding. DS (talk) 18:25, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:Pavel.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 17:10, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
Why on earth did you delete my file? What is the point of the consensus-driven FfD if a file is deleted when the majority are against file deletion and provide stronger arguments, some of which weren't even given time for rebuttal by the deletion-sided editor? You provided no justification for deleting it, and the person who nominated it for deletion has no understanding of the concept depicted, and you didn't even give him the chance to respond to my later arguments, unless he perhaps couldn't find a more successful argument.
Regardless, it is in no way your authority to delete files from FfD based on what you think; the whole point of the process is for gaining consensus. This image had consensus against deletion.--ɱ (talk · vbm) 18:18, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
Round one of the 2015 WikiCup has begun! So far we've had around 80 signups, which close on February 5. If you have not already signed up and want to do so, then you can add your name here. There have been changes to to several of the points scores for various categories, and the addition of Peer Reviews for the first time. These will work in the same manner as Good Article Reviews, and all of the changes are summarised here.
Remember that only the top 64 scoring competitors will make it through to the second round, and one of the new changes this year is that all scores must be claimed within two weeks of an article's promotion or appearance, so don't forget to add them to your submissions pages! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs), Miyagawa (talk · contribs) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs)
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:51, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
I would like you to return to your decision to delete this file. There were 2 discussions going on at the time. You based your decision on the smaller of the two discussions on the opinion that two points of NFCC criteria were not met. My argument, which was supported by others, was that there were two discussions happening and that I had already given a fuller explanation at NFCR that covered the two points you felt were missing. The fact that you choose the smaller of the two discussions and the fact that it largely ignores my rationale at the larger of the two encourages gaming of the system at two different venues. The second discussion should have been closed while the 2nd commenced. The article, at the time of deletion, already contained context about the image. Policy and procedure were not followed in this case. I'm prepared to take it to DRV.--v/r - TP 22:22, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Qtrax Logo 2013.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:38, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Qtrax Logo 2013.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:42, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:ScoreBig 2013 logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 02:15, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello. I did some research on the situation about this image deletion and wanted to start the process for undeletion. The Wiki policy states to contact the reviewing admin first. The image was nominated for deletion as a "copyright violation", however its copyright was never actually in question. It was a movie created by HBO and was listed as a fair use image based on the rarity of the image and one of the only photographs shown worn on a black SS uniform. This was discussed here as well. The original nomination was also tainted with sour grapes [2] (unfortunately). I think the image should be undeleted and posted as fair use to display a rare insignia on a black SS uniform. Thanks for your time. -OberRanks (talk) 05:01, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
That's it, the first round is done, sign-ups are closed and we're into round 2. 64 competitors made it into this round, and are now broken into eight groups of eight. The top two of each group will go through to round 3, and then the top scoring 16 "wildcards" across all groups. Round 1 saw some interesting work on some very important articles, with the round leader Freikorp (submissions) owing most of his 622 points scored to a Featured Article on the 2001 film Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within which qualified for a times-two multiplier. This is a higher score than in previous years, as Godot13 (submissions) had 500 points in 2014 at the end of round 1, and our very own judge, Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) led round 1 with 601 points in 2013.
In addition to Freikorp's work, some other important articles and pictures were improved during round one, here's a snapshot of a few of them:
You may also wish to know that The Core Contest is running through the month of March. Head there for further details - they even have actual prizes!
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), Miyagawa (talk · contribs · email) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email)
Thanks for your assistance! Miyagawa (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiCup.
(Opt-out Instructions) This message was send by Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:55, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Wqyk-color-logo official.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:26, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:PiedmontCollegeOffLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:15, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello TLSuda,
You are receiving this message because you have a one-year subscription to Newspapers.com through the Wikipedia Library. This is a brief update, to remind you about that access:
Finally, we would greatly appreciate it if you filled out this short survey. Your input will help us to facilitate this particular partnership, and to discover what other partnerships and services the Wikipedia Library can offer.
Thank you,
Wikipedia Library Newspapers.com account coordinator HazelAB (talk) 00:24, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
In June 2014, someone replaced File:Pepsi Throwback 2010.png with a picture of a different product. You deleted the older version, citing F5. Instead, I think the change should be reverted, since the new picture is for a different product. The original purpose of the picture, as stated in its description and filename, is to illustrate what Pepsi Throwback looked like in 2010. The current picture seems to be something else – it illustrates "Pepsi-Cola Made with Real Sugar", not "Pepsi Throwback". Can you please revert that? —BarrelProof (talk) 01:12, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
You closed the discussion at Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 June 10#File:Sound Recorder 31.png in blatant disregard for both what WP:NFCC actually states and the well-reasoned arguments another user made in the discussion. The image is so drastically different from the current one in the article that criterion 3 does not even come close to applying. Criterion 8 does not apply either because there is discussion of the older version in the article (that is not even remotely represented by the current screenshot). The fact that the precise older version number is not mentioned does not remove the contextual significance. Mdrnpndr (talk) 16:39, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Can you tell me why does Barcelona has crest on all of it's sub articles, and Benfica couldn't. The explanation of fair use is just basically the same.--Threeohsix (talk) 22:14, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
The second round one has all wrapped up, and round three has now begun! Congratulations to the 34 contestants who have made it through, but well done and thank you to all contestants who took part in our second round. Leading the way overall was Cas Liber (submissions) in Group B with a total of 777 points for a variety of contributions including Good Articles on Corona Borealis and Microscopium - both of which received the maximum bonus.
Special credit must be given to a number of high importance articles improved during the second round.
The points varied across groups, with the lowest score required to gain automatic qualification was 68 in Group A - meanwhile the second place score in Group H was 404, which would have been high enough to win all but one of the other Groups! As well as the top two of each group automatically going through to the third round, a minimum score of 55 was required for a wildcard competitor to go through. We had a three-way tie at 55 points and all three have qualified for the next round, in the spirit of fairness. The third round ends on June 28, with the top two in each group progressing automatically while the remaining 16 highest scorers across all four groups go through as wildcards. Good luck to all competitors for the third round! Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), Miyagawa (talk · contribs · email) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) 16:53, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Please restore:
They fail under ((non-free logo))
and happen to be state government agencies.
—Ahnoneemoos (talk) 17:19, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello, your processing of our recent request for image upload was handled incorrectly.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:IMDEA_Networks_Logo.png#metadata
We have requested that the logo for the IMDEA Software Institute be uploaded as a new file. Instead, the IMDEA Networks Institute logo was replaced with the IMDEA Software Institute logo. These are two separate entities with different logos. The result is that the IMDEA Networks page now has the logo of IMDEA Software erroneously.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IMDEA_Networks_Institute
To fix this the IMDEA Networks Institute logo should be reverted to its previous, correct version, and the IMDEA Software Institute logo be created as a new file, which will be linked to by the IMDEA Software Institute page.
Best regards, M — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.147.107.1 (talk) 09:59, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
The Admin's Barnstar | |
Down to 150 discussions on WP:NFCR :). Thank you for looking into this backlog, it's appreciated. GermanJoe (talk) 00:25, 10 May 2015 (UTC) |
The Admin's Barnstar | |
A big thank you for clearing the backlog at WP:PUF. You really did us a solid! Diannaa (talk) 16:32, 10 May 2015 (UTC) |
hello TLSuda
Can I upload the photo in wikipedia of which license to upload picture this picture http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/celebritymicro/images/id/171/category/parties/type/view/imageid/5778191/ --Gogo212121 (talk) 16:06, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
user gogo212121 hello TLSuda When this picture was taken where I can see when it is --Gogo212121 (talk) 17:49, 8 May 2015 (UTC) UserGogo212121 Hello TLSuda if I upload my photo will delete you --Gogo212121 (talk) 16:21, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello, and thank you for your request at Files for upload! Unfortunately, your request has been declined. The reason is shown on the main FFU page. The request will be archived shortly; if you cannot find it on that page, it will probably be at this month's archive. Regards, TLSuda (talk) 17:10, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Where do I find your question??? Stagophile (talk) 13:07, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
This upload request has been declined. Please do not modify it. |
---|
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Re File:Official UK ‘No Through Road’ sign.png
I'm very irritated that you deleted this after the time and effort spent creating, uploading and ensuring this image was correct and not infringing copyright. The reasons you gave for deletion are bogus as the file you claim already exists (File:UK_traffic_sign_816.svg) is, in fact, wrong. And the "slightly different tint" is also incorrect. Consulting the latest specifications of the UK Government's road signs would have shown you this. This is why the file was uploaded in the first place. This is all very annoying and has caused yet more inaccurate information to be disseminated by Wikipedia. Chairboy73 (talk) 14:49, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
You left no comment on my picture. Feeling confused.--88.111.129.157 (talk) 16:23, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Hey! May I ask, you assist with ticket:2015051710012141 as you previously dealt with him/her on ticket:2014071610021202. It's regarding some PDF file which was recently flagged for deletion. Thanks, ///EuroCarGT 20:01, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Sorry! I didn't mean to upload the file after you'd commented asking for a fair use rationale from the requester, ultimately stepping on your toes. You hadn't commented on the request yet when I decided to just do the rationale myself and started the process of uploading the image, and I didn't notice your comment until I'd already uploaded it and went to go accept the request. Have a good day! --Nick—Contact/Contribs 21:48, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi, The photos for 2 articles Skyway Enterprises Flight 7101 and Loganair Flight 670A have been deleted. These photos were of the actual planes that the articles depict. During all my research I never found any free photos. Both of these planes crashed and were destroyed w/loss of life. I contacted both photo owners and got permission to use them. I've read Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria. There is no free equivalent for these photos and it is quite impossible for further photos to be taken. Is there a way we can get these photos reinstated? Thanks for your consideration. Samf4u (talk) 21:12, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
For being very helpful and thinking outside the box. Samf4u (talk) 01:16, 19 May 2015 (UTC) |
Please restore the image. I fixed the licensing of the image on the same day that the possibly un-free inquiry was made, so I would like the image to be restored. Thanks. Kamran Mackey (talk) 09:01, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:James "Oklahoma Jack" Clark mugshot.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Stefan2 (talk) 23:19, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Russell Lee "Boobie" Clark.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Stefan2 (talk) 23:20, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi TLSuda. We got an email from a reader saying this is actually Walter Detrich, not James Clark. If you go here and scroll down to the mugshots section, Clark is listed but the name hyperlinked to the image is Detrich's. Maybe your source was wrong, or perhaps they are mistaken, or the ICPR site is wrong? Just thought I'd let you know if you want to remove it or correct it or something. I note we don't have an article on Clark in any case. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 20:34, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
I don't usually do this, but I just don't see how you could determine there was "clear consenus" (per the wording at WP:NFCR) here to say the file should be deleted given low participation and the fact that it was previously decided it should be kept in a discussion with much greater participation. Calidum T|C 15:22, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
I just read your message on my talk page. Thank-you. You are very kind. I found a somewhat simpler solution to my problem: I no longer upload images to the site. Thanks again. -- Jason Palpatine (talk) 18:17, 30 May 2015 (UTC) This User fails to understand Wikipedia's Systematized Logistical Projection of its Balanced Policy Contingency. (speak your mind | contributions)
First of all how is it wrong to put the official logo to describe the Florida State football and baseball on their main page? That is how each team is recognized. The Ohio State University, University of Michigan, University of Florida, UC-Los Angeles, UC- Berkeley, and the University of Alabama all have their respective logos representing each of of their sports on their pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SeminoleNation (talk • contribs) 18:05, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
You make no sense. Judging from your talk page it seems like I'm not the only person who finds you bothersome. I'll find a way to put the FSU images back. No editors had a problem with the images before you came along. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SeminoleNation (talk • contribs) 16:06, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Okay well if you know so much about what images can or cannot be used. Then how about instead of just removing it completely from a page and making it look incomplete why don't you try to find a suitable replacement of that image which can be used. Not everyone who edits on wikipedia knows what has to be done.--SeminoleNation (talk) 16:27, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi, TLSuda, Yes, Darlene June Nay (formerly Darlene Sellek) is the copyright holder, but the image has been licensed as noted. What evidence is required and how do I submit that evidence? Pedoggett (talk) 01:40, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi TLSuda, I saw your exchange on Files For Upload with regards to the Canada Games text logo vs full logo. I tried to pull up the file to run a Google Image Search to look for any other instances of the logo besides what the user provided, and interestingly enough, now that file has been removed from ryushare for expiration, self-deletion, or removed for a Terms of Use violation. Just thought you should know. RegistryKey(RegEdit) 12:54, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi, you deleted File:Liberland znak.png and . Did it "lack licensing information for seven days after being identified as such"? (Media files that lack the necessary licensing information to verify copyright status may be deleted after being identified as such for seven days if the information is not added.) Was there any info? It might be in the public domain.. I suppose one has to check the file to see the notice.. Thanks, --WikiHannibal (talk) 17:15, 3 June 2015 (UTC)