Your submission at Articles for creation: John Adams (Virginia government) (October 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
EROS message 14:44, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Stegopo! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EROS message 14:44, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Adams (Virginia government) has been accepted[edit]

John Adams (Virginia government), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 17:55, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Stegopo

Thank you for creating John Adams (Virginia government).

User:Ifnord, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

The inline references are good, it makes the bibliography section somewhat spurious. I would advise pruning the bibliography section considerably, consider removing it entirely.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|Ifnord)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ifnord (talk) 19:00, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Stegopo! Your additions to Multiple myeloma have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 12:19, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]