A tag has been placed on David Lazar (rabbi) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 01:10, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Stefanonilteg! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! AmaryllisGardener (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:22, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Lazar (rabbi) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Lazar (rabbi) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 10:58, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, you can't use G7 (one author request) because there have been too many editors. G7 can only be used when the only other edits are typo corrections, adding categories and so on. You could try contacting anyone who has added incorrect info, or try WP:AFD. If stuff has been added that you don't like, but which is apparently correct and referenced, there's no way of getting rid other than proving it to be incorrect with better references. Peridon (talk) 21:20, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The entire text was written by me with minor edits by other members, as in changing Rabbi David Lazar into David Lazar (rabbi) and fixing the reference structure which I got wrong at first edit.

Looks like someone's added a load of references, and didn't you complain about someone making alterations? Have a word with the admin who nominated it at AfD (at User talk:DGG about possibly having another go at AfD (with you nominating it - that'll shock 'em...). He might have other suggestions - or even disagree with my decline of the G7. Peridon (talk) 21:37, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Lazar (rabbi) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Lazar (rabbi) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 04:09, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]