![]() | Do not edit this page. This is the archive of User talk:Smasongarrison for the year 2022. (Please direct any additional comments to the current talk page.) See the annual archives for 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 |
I'd like to echo DrKay's concerns about your high-volume edits relating to the phrase "suffer from". This phrase does seem to be used in plenty of formal writing in RS that we cite, so I'm not sure that it represents a problem wrt WP:TONE. And some of your rewrites are definitely changing the intended meaning of sentences, or at least making them a little clunky. e.g. here when you changed and later cared for Jordan when Jordan began to suffer from multiple sclerosis in 1973
to and later cared for Jordan when Jordan had multiple sclerosis in 1973
- which makes it sound like she only had it in 1973. I'd suggest starting a discussion to see if there's consensus for these mass changes (unless there's already been one and I missed it?). Colin M (talk) 20:35, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
Having seen you "copy-editing", I am requesting that you please stop making edits concerning disabilities or those suffering from various ailments. These are not superficial edits, since many concern serious medical conditions: the edits are often arbitrary and misleading to readers of this encyclopedia. In addition, they are not systematic, with articles from M to Z barely looked at. (There are almost 40,000 edits, none of which show content creation.) Thanks, Mathsci (talk) 11:12, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
"Thank you for your email asking me to stop raising concerns about your edits. If you are unwilling to discuss your editing on-wiki then perhaps you would be better off not editing. This has nothing to do with you being a woman, despite what you say. It has everything to do with you making multiple errors, refusing to correct them, and refusing to enter into conversations with other editors who are trying to get you to improve your editing. I have never come across a good-faith editor as unresponsive and uncommunicative as you. Communication between editors is essential to the functioning of Wikipedia, and your method of talk-page management seriously undermines this. I'll repeat my advice - slow down, check each edit before you make it, and try to show a little respect for others who are trying to help."If somebody has suffered from a stroke, then NHS documentation is quite clear about things:[1] "The Acute Stroke Unit and the Lewin Rehabilitation Unit combine to make the Stroke Unit, caring for patients who have suffered a stroke." Why avoid the word "suffer" using a bot-like script? Mathsci (talk) 02:01, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
WP:SUFFER. Regardless, I've shifted away from making edits about those kinds of things. Nevertheless, you following me and changing back edits about disability that shouldn't use terminology like suffering per numerous style guides MOS:DISABILITIES is problematic.
So I please ask you again, to stop following my edits. I get your point about stroke and am willing to work through that. HOWEVER PLEASE STOP following me and rechecking all of my edits. It is making me uncomfortable. Smasongarrison (talk) 11:04, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Mathsci (talk) 04:15, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Howdy - I noticed this edit to the Ted Kaczynski article that you made changing "suffered from" to "had". I personally don't have a stance on the actual change of phrasing here and I understand there's been some discussion on it already, but your edit changed they saw no indication that he suffered from paranoid schizophrenia to they saw no indication that he had from paranoid schizophrenia. I think it goes without saying that "he had from" in this context is grammatically incorrect. The article is a high-traffic FA, and as such all edits to it should be carefully considered to make sure they do not cause problems to the article. This kind of attention to detail is expected for AWB use on all articles, but I would think that it should be especially present on FAs. Thanks! AviationFreak💬 02:18, 2 May 2022 (UTC) (please ping on reply)
Hi there. I saw your edit at Ben Simmons regarding "suffered a fracture". I'm not contesting the edit, per se, but I also don't see WP:SUFFER from the edit summary as being directly applicable to physical injuries like a fracture. I do see that you have received feedback about other edits regarding suffer. Do be careful with the automated edits, though I think this was probably just a one-off. WP:AWBRULES does state:
If challenged, the onus is on the AWB operator to demonstrate or achieve consensus for changes they wish to make on a large scale.
Best.—Bagumba (talk) 05:15, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Note: this edit of yours was reverted by user D.Lazard for the reasons given. Please note that replacing singles spaces with double ones or vice versa is a waste of time and against retain rules as outlined in MOS:PUNCTSPACE: "Software condenses two or more spaces to just one when rendering a page, so editors may use any spacing style they prefer." See also MOS:STYLERET. DVdm (talk) 16:18, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
The Minor Barnstar | |
For minor -- but important -- edits keeping the Wikipedia Shipshape and Bristol fashion, in other words All Sir Garnet. Herostratus (talk) 19:11, 28 May 2022 (UTC) |
So, this was inspired by this particular edit, which I ran into at random, but it seems you've done others like that, so here's some recognition for that, which may not make you famous but is well appreciated. Herostratus (talk) 19:11, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Stop replacing suffer with experience. This issue has been raised multiple times, but you're still doing it, resulting in absurd and unidiomatic contortions of grammar that a native English speaker would never say. It is disruptive to continue with a series of edits after being asked to stop. Persistent disruption may result in you being blocked from editing. DrKay (talk) 06:02, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
|works=
is not a valid cs1|2 template parameter; see your edit. Further, in that citation, |website=atrocitynews.com
should be deleted so that the proper parameter / value pair |work=Atrocity News
can be used; |work=
and |website=
are equal aliases of each other so only one of them is allowed in a cs1|2 template. Please fix your script.
—Trappist the monk (talk) 23:31, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:32, 4 June 2022 (UTC)Hello, Smasongarrison,
Thank you for creating Richard Lucas (psychologist).
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
You new article on Richard Lucas does not establish that he is notable. Unless you provide references to reliable secondary sources, the article will probably be deleted.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|PopePompus))
. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
PopePompus (talk) 23:20, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi Mason, I saw this edit where you correctly trimmed the URL of the Google Books link, but also trimmed the URL of an Internet Archive link to match the new Google Books link. The Internet Archive link is static and any change to it makes it stop working, so in the future, please don't change those. I already fixed this one. Thank you and keep up the good work. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 01:31, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
FYI, as you probably suspected, these hits on June 5 were false positives. I've made adjustments to the edit filter you encountered so that shouldn't happen again. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:44, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi. Your recent edit to Cape Fear (1991 film) provided the apparently-canned edit summary "copy editing assisted by WP:AWB". Unfortunately, this does not help other editors understand how the edit changed the article, therefore, it disables the purpose of edit summaries, rendering them useless.
I do not use WP:AWB; is it possible to disable or override the stock-phrase edit summary to allow you to enter revealing and helpful summaries as you go? Thanks for your attention. O'Dea (talk) 21:20, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
Wednesday June 8, 11am-5pm: New York Botanical Garden - Environment of the Bronx - Editing Wikipedia for Beginners | |
---|---|
![]() Hello Smasongarrison! The LuEsther T. Mertz Library of the New York Botanical Garden and the Environment of New York City Task Force invite you and the general public of all experience levels to come to the Mertz Library in person and learn how to use Wikipedia! All skill levels welcome at the event! Experienced Wikipedia editors from the Wikimedia New York City chapter will be in attendance and available to help. A one hour training session will be offered at the start of this event covering introductory topics. Attendees familiar with editing Wikipedia can edit off of a worklist focused on the environment of New York City; as well as, a sub-list focused on the environment of the Bronx. The Mertz Library will pull topical media from their collection to assist the editing. --Wikimedia New York City Team via Wil540 art (talk) 22:45, 6 June 2022 (UTC) |
Thanks for your recent edits to Myopia, in particular for your investigation of the engagement of the field with the suggestion in the Medina literature review on "The cause of myopia development and progression ..." and your consequent lessening of the weight given to it in the article. There was a lot of toing and froing (much of it conducted by what I suspected to be a surrogate of the author) about how the mention of it should be worded and I was responsible for its firming up on the single-author description (and the changing of 'paper' to 'literature review').
(I hope I've done something towards cheering this user up.) -- Jmc (talk) 01:45, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Please be more careful with AWB. See this edit and this edit, which I have fixed for you. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:01, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Ok, ignore that... now I understand that you're talking about the '''s edit. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:AutoWikiBrowser?markasread=249028275&markasreadwiki=enwiki#c-John_of_Reading-2022-06-09T17:28:00.000Z-Jonesey95-2022-06-09T17:15:00.000Z
Thanks for catching it! Smasongarrison (talk) 19:00, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Hey Smasongarrison how are you doing today? KcauqElZtak (talk) 22:44, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Is it OK if we talk just you and me? KcauqElZtak (talk) 23:16, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Do you like horror films? KcauqElZtak (talk) 23:18, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
What's your favorite? KcauqElZtak (talk) 23:21, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Greetings @ Frankystein3,
Hi, I am User:Bookku, I find information and knowledge gaps create Drafts, try to recruit draft expanding editors and promote drafts articles for further expansion. English being not native language I am do depend for language c/e support too.
Requesting your visit to following article/ drafts and help expand the same if any of these interests you.
Looking forward to support, if possible.
Thanks and warm regards
Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 02:20, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
I think an audio book narrator with the name "Reading" is a great aptonym. I saw you removed it. That's okay! I'm not very adept at making edits that comply with the rigorous standards expected. Can you help me with adding this entry to the page properly? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.88.58.16 (talk) 18:29, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi Mason, I noticed this edit to the Crutch by GünniX on my watchlist and was puzzled by it because there haven't been any major edits to the article lately. It turns out that it was caused by this edit of yours over a month ago. I just wanted to give you a heads up in case there might have been other similar problems with your edits. Graham87 15:42, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in the English Wikipedia Manual of Style and article titles policy. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place ((Ds/aware))
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
— Ⓜ️hawk10 (talk) 22:08, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi, can you please help me in the wikipedia page of the Beta Israel community? There is a guy there ( which I think is the manger ) and he keep deleting sources and writes whenever he wants. Can you please provide me help with that? 2A02:6680:1106:1FCE:250E:E104:93A1:5652 (talk) 23:00, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
It’s there a chance you can help me with the Edward Mercado Draft:Edward Mercado I don’t know what more to do for Wikipedia to accept the little bio. Sorry to bother you. Thank you Lider510 Lider510 (talk) 16:29, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
In case anyone else needs convincing evidence that user:Mathsci is Wikihounding me.
I've reproduced this recent comment I made on Words to Watch
Yep, I had hoped that it was just a misunderstanding... and that could be cleared up without conflict (like last month). Unfortunately, he's decided that personal attacks are acceptable, as is following my edits. I've asked him to stop repeatedly, unfortunately, he seems to have done this kind of thing before and blocking doesn't seem to stop him from doing this kind of thing. Smasongarrison (talk) 18:39, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Please take a moment to look at a page after you have edited it, before moving on. This edi left the page in a mess because you had left a line starting with a space, which messes up the display. I've fixed it - and got distracted onto doing a whole lot more to the page too. Thanks. PamD 18:50, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
You probably need to restart your job where it left off. AManWithNoPlan (talk) 18:24, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Mason, could you please have a look at this edit? You have done it three times now ... that is an inline comment, not visible to readers, and only useful when an editor needs to locate the quote. You're removing something to which the guideline does not apply. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 05:25, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi. Your edit filling in bare references has been reverted due to a long-standing concensus existing that Deaths project pages need to retain simple cite formats, and mainly due to the heavy page coding caused by full cites given the sizes of the lists generated each month (slow page loading times are experienced for certain users when the code is too inflated). If you have any further queries on this, please stop by at the talk page. Thanks. Ref (chew)(do) 15:53, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello. According to this edit. PLWP uses ’ than ' symbol otherwise redirection is created. Eurohunter (talk) 17:40, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
((Interlanguage link|Now You're Gone (Bazzheadz song)|lt=Now You're Gone|pl|Now You're Gone|quote=yes))
A kitten for you!
pony in a strange land (talk) 20:24, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Space Shuttle Challenger disaster on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment, and at Talk:Mike Edwards (American journalist) on a "Social sciences and society" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:45, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:The Avengers (2012 film) on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Back (for now) by popular demand, it's the WP:MED Newsletter! Pardon the 9-month hiatus. This month features a catch-up list of promoted GAs since the last newsletter, and some calls to action for those looking to add to their todo lists. I hope this finds you well. Enjoy.
Since last newsletter (Nov. 1, 2021) |
|
WP:MED News
News from around the site
Newsletter ideas, comments, and criticisms welcome here.
You are receiving this because you added your name to the WikiProject Medicine mailing list. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.
Ajpolino (talk) 21:28, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:NJGov on a "Social sciences and society" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:30, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Arbitration Committee Elections December 2022 on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 08:31, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charles Maurras, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page L'Événement. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Samuel Plata on a "Social sciences and society" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 00:30, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello all. A short newsletter reflecting a quiet month in recognized content. If there's other types of content you'd like to see in the newsletter feel free to post suggestions here. Otherwise, here's your update for the month:
|
|
WP:MED News
Newsletter ideas, comments, and criticisms welcome here.
You are receiving this because you added your name to the WikiProject Medicine mailing list. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.
Ajpolino (talk) 03:32, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Koch (surname), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anton Koch.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ireland on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Gender identity on a "Wikipedia style and naming" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello there! My mother asked me whether Levolet is a trade name of Levofloxacin or not. I'm not well-versed in terms of medicine, so I'm asking you right this minute. I googled "trade names of Levofloxacin", and I opened medinda. com (or org. In a word, I don't remember exactly), so, according to the afore-mentioned site, Levolet is a trade name of Levofloxacin. I don't know whether medinda is a liable source. Could you recommend me a good source which deals with the trade names of Levofloxacin?
P. S. Anyway, could you add this trade name in the article on Levofloxacin? Роман Сергеевич Сидоров (talk) 10:27, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Miguel Ojopi on a "Social sciences and society" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:30, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Biographies of living persons on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:31, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:31, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:30, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Category:Painters by gender has been emptied and may be deleted. – Fayenatic London 21:16, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM))
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Akshata Murty on a "Social sciences and society" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:30, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Mariupol on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:30, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Cancer (astrology) on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:30, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Common name broke the hatnote because AWB does not know about ((hatnote group)). Until that is fixed, this is something to watch out for. MB 16:54, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Vivian.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
I've noticed you've tagged a multitude of articles and categories related to Parasports with Disability wikiproject tags. The sheer number of them has me wondering whether a Parasports Task Force might be a good idea. WP Disability by itself has too few participants to take on the curation of all these pages and the various sport projects show little to no interest at all (E.g. Some years ago I asked WP Basketball whether Wheelchair Basketball was within their scope, I never even received a reply.) There is a task force under the Olympics WP that handles the Paralympics, but their scope is very narrowly defined as only the quadrennial event itself. So there's a whole lot of articles that need a WP or at least a Task Force to take care of them. What do you think? Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 14:04, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
Happy Holidays and Happy New Year, Smasongarrison!
The other day, I was having a conversation with someone about holiday cards and social media. It occurred to me that, in the years since I left Facebook, the site I use most to communicate with people I like isn't actually a social media site at all. If you're receiving this, it's pretty likely I've talked with you more recently than I have my distant relatives and college friends on FB, at very least, and we may have even collaborated on something useful. So here's a holiday "card", Wikipedia friend. :) Hope the next couple weeks bring some fun and/or rest. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 18:34, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
Category:Battles won by indigenous peoples of the Americas has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. SpinningSpark 11:39, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
There is no mention of autism in the Julian Assange article so you should not be adding Wikiproject autism to it. I see you are adding that to lots of articles, I think you should be checking them before adding that. I don't quite see the point anyway unless a person is known for it. NadVolum (talk) 11:41, 27 December 2022 (UTC)