Hi there! You've tagged a clause as needing a reference in this article, but the reference at the end of the sentence covers all the claims made in the sentence. Surely it would be a bit heavy handed to duplicate the reference? But I didn't want to just undo your good-faith edit so I thought I'd post here. Alarichall (talk) 15:28, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi. It's not up to me to decide (and while I don't presume to have such knowledge, I take what you are telling me with a grain of salt). The editors in the article "Córdoba, Spain" determined to favour Córdoba (I did not follow the discussion, but English Wikipedia usually favours indeed the most common name in English-language sources, with an ancillary recentist bias phasing out historical terms: see "Kiev"/"Kyiv" or "Corunna"/"A Coruña"). In addition to that criterion (follow the one in the main article), the criterion "use toponym according to the sources cited" comes to mind. What you are doing in a connected article is not constructive, because it is not the place to determine such thing (usage frequencies). In a nutshell: the frequency of usage between option "B" versus option "V" will not be determined on the talk page of the article "Andalusia" (let alone via an exchange of edit summaries in such article), but in the talk page of the article "Córdoba, Spain". Regards.--Asqueladd (talk) 23:03, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi there! Feel free to add sources claiming that the War of 1898 between Spain and USA was not a war between democracies. But please don't remove the citation(s) of a reliable source asserting the contrary, thanx.--- Darius (talk) 15:46, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM))
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of wars between democracies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bourbon Restoration. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:15, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to La Guerre (Rousseau). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:57, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi there, Schweinchen, and welcome to Women in Red. It's good to see you intend to help us to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women. When you feel ready to create your first biography of a woman, you'll find some useful tips in our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 13:39, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red | April 2024, Volume 10, Issue 4, Numbers 293, 294, 302, 303, 304
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Ipigott (talk) 13:39, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red | May 2024, Volume 10, Issue 5, Numbers 293, 294, 305, 306, 307
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:18, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.
This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.
The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.
Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.
On behalf of the UCoC project team,
RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red | June 2024, Volume 10, Issue 6, Numbers 293, 294, 308, 309, 310
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 07:06, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging