Hey man, great work with the history section, it looks so much better now. For the infobox the headcoach should be under manager, in Sweden the head coach has the traditional role of the concept known as manager in other leagues. If you look at Djurgårdens IF Fotboll who also has a manager and two head coaches, the head coaches are in the infobox as it should be. See http://www.syrianskafc.com/Default/tabid/61/Id/09e689ce-d307-4a80-8f11-2bbdbab9de62/Fortydligande-kring-den-nya-huvudtranaren-Bondarenko.aspx for an official statement from Syrianska regarding the role. Keep up the good work! --Reckless182 (talk) 18:51, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi again. I did a little copyediting. Some advice: Don't link something more than once in a section, also don't link to articles such as "English" which are very commonly known and does not need to be linked. Also for the colours and badge section I suggest removing the meanings of the colours on the flag as this really has nothing to do with the club. For the stadium you should try to explain why the stadium is also called Jallavallen, the current explanation makes no sense. Try not to copy from other articles as well. When you have feel that the article is fully written I would advice you to turn to Wikipedia:Guild of copyeditors and request for someone to copyedit the entire article. You could ask me but English is only my second language so I think they would do a better job. --Reckless182 (talk) 22:30, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
I've created a proposal for a Sweden taskforce under Wikipedia:Football, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/WikiProject Football/Sweden task force and support and join if you are interested. --Reckless182 (talk) 19:59, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
I believe we can all benefit from working together. And by all, I don't me just us, but our people, wikipedia, and the readers of this website. Our situation is a controversial one, but it shouldn't hinder progressiveness. Besides, we are from the same nation, weather we like it or not. Chaldean (talk) 15:54, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
Shlomo ah,
I think the article looks OK now. By the way you did a great job on the article, I hope this dispute doesn't discourage you from improving Syrianska related articles. I myself am a Syriac Catholic and a big fan of Syrianska . bShaino.--Rafy talk 16:37, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi, just thought I'd like to help, and say that people are allowed to delete whatever they want from their own talkpage and userpage. Some things you can't write or keep on a talkpage or userpage, like If I was calling you very bad names on my talkpage, that could get deleted by ANI or whoever. But even if I put something good onto your talkpage you can delete it as you wish to. Other things you can't do is pretend to be someone else. Like faking their signature. that's naughty. Penyulap talk 11:08, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
This is an example of faking someone elses signature, it's not allowed SYRIANIEN (talk) 00:00, 01 April 1704 (UTC)
So really it's just just the obvious things like insults and threats, that aren't allowed. You can delete from your own talkpage anything you want to, so long as it doesn't create fake things like making it appear someone said something they didn't. There is also archiving talkpages, so things get deleted automatically, I'm happy to set that up for you if you want. Just ask or reply to this on my talkpage as you wish, or if you need other help that's simple. Penyulap talk 11:16, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of AramaeanSyriac (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log). Banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text ((unblock|Your reason here ~~~~)) below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 15:46, 8 January 2012 (UTC) |