![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Fanboy has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Hello Gaioa. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that there is consensus that we shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1) and/or content (CSD A3) moments after they are created, as you did at Deepak Sharma (activist). It's usually best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course still be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks. 331dot (talk) 09:40, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi before tagging a page as nonsense please check that it isn't simply written in a language that you do not understand. What I do is use Google translate and I paste part of it to see if it recognises the language. Domdeparis (talk) 18:02, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi! I noticed that you've been putting warnings on user talk pages. However, you've been putting 1st level vandalism warnings on talk pages that have already been given more warnings by other people e.g. [[1]], which I already put a first level warning on (it now has two first levels and one second when it should be up to a third level warning) and [[2]] (which was already at a final warning and has been reported to admins, but now has a first level warning tacked on the end). So please check the existing warnings on a user talk page before you add more c: Blue Edits (talk) 06:01, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Yes, absolutely. Noticed my mistake instantly afterwards. Will take for habit to check talk page before warning next time. Thanks!Gaioa (talk) 06:02, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi Gaioa,
I made some changes to page 'Robert Gallagher'. I can verify they are legitimate, as I am Robert Gallagher. I can add some links to some of the changes too, and plan to do so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.242.19.20 (talk) 17:36, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
I keep getting a message from you that you are reverting attempts to change information on Liz Goldwyn's page. I am her assistant and trying to update the page. What do I need to do to add information so that you will not block it?
500+ edits! And permission to edit Donald Trump and all other high-risk articles! Yay for me! I'm helping!
(sorry, just a bit happy for myself)
Gaioa (talk) 17:52, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello Gaioa, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Robert Gallagher, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims importance/significance of the subject. If you are interested in learning more about how speedy deletion works, I have compiled a list of helpful pages at User:SoWhy/SDA. You can of course also contact me if you have questions. Thank you. SoWhy 15:24, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi Gaioa! Many thanks for your help patrolling new pages. While going through new pages just now I noticed two of your CSD: Zamani Mbatha has been tagged as A1. This would not be the correct category. A1 is used for entirely unclear topics. This is not the case. The person is clearly identified as actor including the files. This is a case of BLPROD at first. A1 and A3 should also not be applied to soon, as happened on 徐环expose. Please allow at least 10 minutes to give editors - especially newbies - some time to make their point. Normally there's no rush to A1 and A3, see WP:NPPNICE. Any questions, pls let me know. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 17:15, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for your warning regarding the new page I created on Joe Clifford. In the talk section there, I have added an attestation that it is not an autobiography. I have also added some supporting material in keeping with Wikipedia's BLP policy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rory1262 (talk • contribs) 14:59, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
'Hello! Great that you wanted to talk about the banana peel in the tree, and thank you for providing a source. That's what we like! However, in my opinion, the event is really not notable enough for a Wikipedia mention. I'm sure you feel that it is (since I have a feeling you were involved with it somehow or attends the varsity), but it's not really of interest to people reading about the university in general. How you understand and have a great day! I'll throw in a welcoming too. Gaioa (talk) 14:56, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
Please see MOS:SINGLE, and go self-revert any other changes of single-quoted English glosses of non-English terms that you converted to double-quotes or italics (I already fixed this at Apostrophe and at Vasaloppet (which also needed ((lang))
markup). — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ< 00:06, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello! Gaioa,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 05:07, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
|