But, with regard to Madonna album covers and chart statistics, the problem was that the anon (you?) was not only adding titles incorrectly capitalised, but changing existing correct titles to incorrect. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 20:20, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
Just stopped by to say hi and to tell you to continue with your good work on Madonna and her discography. You really love her, dont you? She is one of my fav artists too. Anyway take care. Oran e (t) (c) (@) 22:41, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
The offical new title of Issac is now the The Binding of Issac... Look at the following link... Plus, you know Madonna could of made a revision of the title of the song before it is released right? Here's the link to proof the above! It is also being previewed on VH1.com! [1]
--Red-Blue-White 14:02, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
Hi, I had to revert your edit as nationality should be stated in the header, italian american is not a nationality, so I added "She identifies as an Italian American." at the end of the intro. Arniep 17:00, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
Do you have a username at de: ? Jkelly 01:48, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
Sorry about the multiple edits ;) --Red-Blue-White 00:25, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
Hey RBW, just a quick note to direct your attention to Wikipedia:WikiProject Music/Tables for charts (see Talk Page also). If you don't feel like reading through all of the discussion there, basically it states that one of the guidelines in music tables is to discourage the boldfacing of number 1 chart positions. I thought maybe you'd want to know, as I noticed you recently went through the Madonna discography table and made all the 1's bold. Still looks great tho... I'm on my way out the door right now to buy her new album :-) -- eo 13:51, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
This is clearly a difference of opinion. While you may consider the article on Madonna's discography to be "clean," I find it to be a complete mess. I agree that it is useless to start an edit war over this. From now on, I'll try to edit the Britney Spears' discography article with more respect to the other Wikipedians and their versions. I'm sorry if you felt like I was trying to destroy any of your own edits; that was not my goal at all, I was just attempting to make the article cleaner and sleaker. Triggy 06:17, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
==Its Unfair to use the promotional image of an album in you personal page. Please remove the piture link of Impressive instant from your user page.Vivek 13:48, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
It's unfair to write crap in foreign languages. This scan is no promotional image. --Red-Blue-White 02:25, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
Hey! I see that you have done a lot of work on various Madonna articles and I was wondering if you would like to help me further expand the article on "Hung Up", adding information of its musical structure and maybe on the ABBA sample. I think the article has potential and would like to see a Madonna article one day reach feature article status. Any help would be great. Thanks. — Underneath-it-All 04:27, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
Hello, Red-Blue-White. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Impressive Instant.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Red-Blue-White. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 09:08, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
I've noted you recently made some significant alterations to the performer list. None of the performers you added are on the official website, and some that you removed were listed. Since there seems to be a real challenge getting a complete and correct line-up for this particular concert, could you please provide sources for any additions/removals? (You could well be right, but the performer lists have been subject to a lot of "wishful thinking" from the beginning, so it is appropriate to source the changes.) Thanks. Risker 20:20, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
I copied them from the German Wiki - I don't know if the list is correct. --Red-Blue-White 15:41, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
You recently have contributed to article talk page regarding Album Sales. In an attempt to resolve this conflict, we have opened up a simple place to help sort this out at: Talk:Britney Spears discography#Album_Sales. This is an attempt to find a consensus regarding reliable and accurate sources. Currently only two people have contributed to this list, and I would hate for you to miss out on chipping in your two cents. The rules are simple.... Simply enter in the source you consider a reliable source of figures for the album sales. The other fine print is on the talk page. With your help, I hope we can end this debate -- if only for a short while. :) Thanks again, Tiggerjay 00:50, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Hello. In regards to the inputs you made on Madonna's album and Candy Shop, it would be much better if you gave more than just a mere vote. Here at Wikipedia, we make decisions based on consensus, and not just votes. Admc2006 (talk) 21:23, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Hey ,you said you wanted Thriller 25 a merged article from Thriller (album). Just wondering, have you re-considered since then, now it's out? It's just we're trying to get a consensus going on the talk page. It'd be nice for you to either contribute to debate, or state if your opinion has changed. Consider how much both the articles have changed since your last imput as they have both seen changes.--Realist2 (talk) 17:41, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
You said (in the revision history on her discography) that a single Holiday album should not have its own section. In addition to adding a missing rereleased album, I gave Cool Yule its own section again. Whether it's 1 album or 10(!) albums, holiday albums deserve to have their own section. Of course, this is merely my personal opinion as I like searching for holiday music around this time of year and finding albums this way makes it a lot easier...but if you can point out some guideline that strictly says a single album doesn't get its own section, I'm all ears. =)
I wonder if there's an ongoing updated list of released holiday albums. That would be a massive project, but man, that would be another nice page to have.
EDIT: I've now found the Destiny's Child discography. Compilations, Remix albums, and Holiday albums all have one album each and their own sections. I have not edited this, but I believe it's right to conform to each individual section as the album types ARE different. Cheers. =) CycloneGU (talk) 14:34, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
I don't change it - but it's a useless category. --Red-Blue-White (talk) 15:52, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
I think it's just a matter of opinion. I'm interested in whether there is a guideline to this. No worries, I'll be going through a lot of music and redoing some of the pages. I have to do some more work on my Ben E. King page as well once I finish adding albums (I'm a few away) since I don't have compilations and live albums in there yet. =) CycloneGU (talk) 00:16, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi there! please give a reason for your edits! do not just undo them without any reason!! There is no need for spacing at the review section! Thank U! (MariAna Mimi 20:01, 27 October 2009 (UTC))
i'm a good reader and it is NOT visible that there are 2 different reviews. Red-Blue-White (talk) 20:05, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
Sorry, but i believe I am right and you are wrong. Please notice that the articles are not your property. Maybe you haven't the right distance. But I will change it not again cause an editwar is not worth it.. Red-Blue-White (talk) 20:14, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Progress Live, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Together and Go West (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:28, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Just because the New Yorker article states that Sharknado "is a slapdash combination of Jaws and Twister" does not mean it is a mockbuster of the two films. A film is a mockbuster if it is imitating a larger-budget film released within the same year. - Areaseven (talk) 08:09, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Red-Blue-White. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)