![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thanks for uploading File:Skins-Cast-2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
((bots|deny=DASHBot))
to your talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:26, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi--I am trying to straighten out the Signpost /subpages, and there seem to be half under WP:Wikipedia Signpost/ and half under WP:Signpost/. Since WP:Wikipedia Signpost is a move-protected page, wouldn't it make sense that all the subpages should be under that page, so that it would avoid double-redirects? Also, it would be easier to find the subpages while during a search. Would like to know what you think. Regards, --Funandtrvl (talk) 07:57, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
[1] Note the removal of the '$3's? I assume the weren't deliberate? - Jarry1250 [Weasel? Discuss.] 09:26, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Cass 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
((bots|deny=DASHBot))
to your talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:53, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
Wow your achievements are great !! Monica2202 (talk) 06:31, 24 August 2011 (UTC) |
Pretzels, I just rolled back your change on the Community Portal. Please get consensus before you make that big of a change. I will voluntarily observe 1rr on that page regarding this change. Thanks @-Kosh► Talk to the Vorlons►Markab-@ 22:54, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
@-Kosh► Talk to the Vorlons►Markab-@
Pretzels, Your name has been mentioned in a posting [| on ANI]. I'm notifying you of it so that you may give your input on this posting. @-Kosh► Talk to the Vorlons►Narn (Loyal Bat Squad Member)-@ 17:25, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
You can shave a bit off the Signpost preload by using this pipe trick. Really, people should know about this one; it's quite useful, as pipe tricks go ;). Happy holidays, ResMar 14:42, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
About this? ResMar 16:00, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Graphic Designer's Barnstar |
Your proposed SOPA blackout screen looks amazing. Great job! v/r - TP 00:35, 17 January 2012 (UTC) |
Hey there,
I've just submitted a design for the SOPA blackout - so far there have been no responses (yet!); should my design receive any votes I wondering if you could do the coding for it since I haven't the slightest clue on where to start
From France :) Jeanbaptiste.s (talk) 02:22, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
"Warning sign This media file does not have sufficient information on its copyright status. Unless the copyright status is provided, the file will be deleted seven days after this template was added: (17 January 2012)." and "This media file has been nominated for deletion since 17 January 2012. Reason for the nomination: "Wikimedia Commons accepts only free content"" - see http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Wikipedia_SOPA_Blackout_Design.png Bulwersator (talk) 12:02, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
The art looks awesome. Words to live by...
"The people shall not be deprived or abridged of their right to speak, to write, or to publish their sentiments; and the freedom of the press, as one of the great bulwarks of liberty, shall be inviolable."
—Madison
"The Bill of Rights changed the original Constitution into a new charter under which no branch of government could abridge the people's freedoms of press, speech, religion, and assembly. Yet the Solicitor General argues and some members of the Court appear to agree that the general powers of the Government adopted in the original Constitution should be interpreted to limit and restrict the specific and emphatic guarantees of the Bill of Rights adopted later. I can imagine no greater perversion of history."
— Justice Black, NEW YORK TIMES CO. v. UNITED STATES, 403 U.S. 713 (1971)
"The press was to serve the governed, not the governors. The Government's power to censor the press was abolished so that the press would remain forever free to censure the Government. The press was protected so that it could bare the secrets of government and inform the people. Only a free and unrestrained press can effectively expose deception in government. And paramount among the responsibilities of a free press is the duty to prevent any part of the government from deceiving the people and sending them off to distant lands to die of foreign fevers and foreign shot and shell."
— Justice Black, NEW YORK TIMES CO. v. UNITED STATES, 403 U.S. 713 (1971)
Thanks for the hard work!. —ArtifexMayhem (talk) 20:06, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Designer's Barnstar |
For your distinguished visual contributions during the SOPA initiative, I hereby award you this barnstar.
P.S. Few people can claim to have ever created something that garnered ≈10:1 support in a controversial setting, but you're now one of them. Keep up the good work! — C M B J 13:24, 19 January 2012 (UTC) |
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:W blackout shadow.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sumanch (talk) 09:03, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi Pretzels. I notice you have been making changes to the web design page, currently the University of Hull are running a module which requires third year students to work in teams and improve the quality of some pages. One group are working on the web design page and have a discussion on its talk page. Perhaps you'd like to join in with the discussion and help the students improve both the page the way the edit pages. One of the most important parts of this module is to engage with the community so any communication positive or negative will be beneficial, thanks. WBClarkson (talk) 11:45, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
![]() Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite Hello Pretzels. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released. Please click HERE to participate. You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 02:21, 6 April 2012 (UTC) |
![]() Issue I - May 2012 | |
|
Hi, and welcome to the first issue of the Help Project newsletter! This is a new monthly initiative to keep project members and the wider community informed about our work to improve Wikipedia's help pages. Any comments or suggestions for future issues are welcome at Wikipedia:Help Project/Newsletter. I've initially sent this to all existing members of the project, if you don't wish to receive the newsletter on your talk page in future then just edit the participants page and add "no newsletter" next to your name. Conversely if you've just stumbled on this newsletter (perhaps through talk page stalking) and want to receive it in future then please feel free to sign up! |
|
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:UK Youth Parliament House of Commons 2009.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:54, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi Pretzels! I noticed that you contributed to the Community portal awhile back (I think your proposal to get rid of the extraneous help links was definitely worth a proper discussion, and it's a shame that it got dismissed). I'd really appreciate your input on a new discussion I just started on the talk page. Since the bot that used to update the open tasks has been MIA since February, I thought it was about time to talk about what purpose(s) that page is serving and how we can make it more useful. Thanks in advance for your thoughts on this :) Maryana (WMF) (talk) 18:37, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
![]() Issue II - June 2012 | |
|
Hello from the Help Project, and welcome to the second issue of our newsletter! The biggest project I've been working on this month has been a large survey of users to find out what they think of our current help pages. Preliminary results from this are now available, although there are more responses trickling in from the lower edit count groups since a batch of email invitations were recently sent out. Finalised results and further analysis should be posted next week. Any comments or suggestions for future issues are welcome at Wikipedia:Help Project/Newsletter. If you don't wish to receive this newsletter on your talk page in future then just edit the participants page and add "no newsletter" next to your name. |
|
Hi! I'm contacting you because you have participated or discussed The Wikipedia Adventure learning tutorial/game idea. I think you should know about a current Community Fellowship proposal to create the game with some Wikimedia Foundation support. Your feedback on the proposal would be very much appreciated. I should note that the feedback is for the proposal, not the proposer, and even if the Fellowship goes forward it might be undertaken by presently not-mentioned editors. Thanks again for your consideration.
Proposal: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Fellowships/Project_Ideas/The_Wikipedia_Adventure
Cheers, User:Ocaasi 16:41, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
![]() Issue III - August 2012 | |
|
Welcome to the (slightly delayed) third issue of the Help Project newsletter. The past month has once again been a busy one for my fellowship. The full results and conclusions from the extensive user survey on help pages are now available, and make interesting reading. These do confirm a number of our suspicions about Wikipedia help, and suggest that the current plan for the remainder of the fellowship is a sound approach. Also last month I was fortunate enough to attend Wikimania 2012 in Washington DC, where I gave a presentation about help pages and the aforementioned survey results. You can find the slides from this on Commons. Wikimania was also a great opportunity for many discussions with staff and community members, and these brought up some interesting ideas which I hope to follow up on. One of the things much discussed was the planned tutorial pages. I've been working on a new design for them which can be seen at User:The wub/sandbox/1, please let me know what you think (especially if you spot any bugs!). Any comments or suggestions for future issues are welcome at Wikipedia:Help Project/Newsletter. If you don't wish to receive this newsletter on your talk page in future then just edit the participants page and add "no newsletter" next to your name. |
Hallo. Just to clarify, I meant change the header to something unique/meaningful/descriptive, such as "Pretzels' design - feedback requested". Or similar. ;) -- Quiddity (talk) 21:45, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:UK Youth Parliament House of Lords 2008.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:33, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Brilliant Idea Barnstar |
I love, love, love your proposal for the main page. I'm particularly thrilled with the showcasing of the featured picture. Good work! Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 09:03, 27 September 2012 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Special Barnstar |
This barnstar is awarded to you in appreciation of your submission to the WP:2012 main page redesign proposal. The straw poll has now closed (see results), but the discussion continues on the talk page – hope to see you there! Evad37 (talk) 00:39, 1 November 2012 (UTC) |
Hi, I'm trying to contact the original author of the blackout logo to request permission to use it in an educational textbook. Unfortunately the electronic version of the text will be protected by DRM which would put us in violation of the CC license so we need to request a separate permission. Would you be able to get me in touch with the orignal author by any chance? I can be contacted @ brooks.hill-whilton@pearson.com. 192.234.246.206 (talk) 19:12, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:35, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited City of Bath College, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bath (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:30, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi there! I've just see your Wikipedia main page redesign proposal and I think it's great! I'm currently attempting to redesign the front page on Wikimedia's latest project Wikivoyage. Would it be ok for me to use the code for the 'Wikimedia family' from your proposal? Thanks, Nicholasjf21 (talk) 00:38, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
Round 1 is now over. The top 64 scorers have progressed to round 2, where they have been randomly split into eight pools of eight. At the end of April, the top two from each pool, as well as the 16 highest scorers from those remaining, will progress to round 3. Commiserations to those eliminated; if you're interested in still being involved in the WikiCup, able and willing reviewers will always be needed, and if you're interested in getting involved with other collaborative projects, take a look at the WikiWomen's Month discussed below.
Round 1 saw 21 competitors with over 100 points, which is fantastic; that suggests that this year's competition is going to be highly competative. Our lower scores indicate this, too: A score of 19 was required to reach round 2, which was significantly higher than the 11 points required in 2012 and 8 points required in 2011. The score needed to reach round 3 will be higher, and may depend on pool groupings. In 2011, 41 points secured a round 3 place, while in 2012, 65 was needed. Our top three scorers in round 1 were:
Other contributors of note include:
Featured topics have still played no part in this year's competition, but once again, a curious contribution has been offered by The C of E (submissions): did you know that there is a Shit Brook in Shropshire? With April Fools' Day during the next round, there will probably be a good chance of more unusual articles...
March sees the WikiWomen's History Month, a series of collaborative efforts to aid the women's history WikiProject to coincide with Women's History Month and International Women's Day. A number of WikiCup participants have already started to take part. The project has a to-do list of articles needing work on the topic of women's history. Those interested in helping out with the project can find articles in need of attention there, or, alternatively, add articles to the list. Those interested in collaborating on articles on women's history are also welcome to use the WikiCup talk page to find others willing to lend a helping hand. Another collaboration currently running is an an effort from WikiCup participants to coordinate a number of Easter-themed did you know articles. Contributions are welcome!
A few final administrative issues. From now on, submission pages will need only a link to the article and a link to the nomination page, or, in the case of good article reviews, a link to the review only. See your submissions' page for details. This will hopefully make updating submission pages a little less tedious. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) J Milburn (talk) 00:50, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 09:43, 14 April 2013 (UTC)is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:57, 26 April 2013 (UTC)is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:45, 20 May 2013 (UTC)is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:58, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
nice work. hope Greenwald didn't get a total snowjob and this guy is legit. Decora (talk) 22:06, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
“ | "I understand that I will be made to suffer for my actions," but "I will be satisfied if the federation of secret law, unequal pardon and irresistible executive powers that rule the world that I love are revealed even for an instant." | ” |
hi "pretzels"- the "mass editing" came after someone listed unnecessary obscenities on the edward snowden page. you're welcome. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.78.23.126 (talk) 18:54, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Hey Pretzel, you deserve a barnstar for your work so far on the Snowden article. I can't be bothered to look up the right template, so this will have to do for now. -- Hillbillyholiday talk 00:22, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
I noticed the message you recently left to 71.180.121.48. Please remember not to bite the newcomers. If you see someone make a common mistake, try to politely point out what they did wrong and how to correct it. Thank you. A warning was definitely required, but this was level 3 for a first offense. Per WP:BITING "Even if you are 100% sure that someone is a worthless, no-good Internet troll, vandal, or worse, conduct yourself as if they are not." — Bill W. (Talk) (Contrib) — 19:41, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for helping with the ref tags in the Edward Snowden article. Much appreciated.
Could you link to a wikipedia guide that shows the exact syntax for full ref tags? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fan.of.devin (talk • contribs) 22:25, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Edward Snowden, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Salon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:12, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Guardian front page 10 June 2013.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ohc ¡digame!¿que pasa? 02:56, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Hey Pretzels! Cute name. Whatever -- I do NOT have a conflict of interest in the material concerning Edward Snowden. I do NOT HAVE a close connection with EDWARD SNOWDEN in any way shape or form. So kindly remove your yellow card.
I have met plenty of people on Wikipedia with a conflict of interest. So I know it when I see it.
And one more thing -- you better come with PROOF before you start accusing me of 'CONFLICT OF INTEREST' again. There is a great difference between having an interest, and a conflict of interest. So if you have any proof -- of your accusations, make it public. And it better be good. Otherwise, delete your yellow card. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.108.207.38 (talk) 19:49, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:02, 20 June 2013 (UTC)is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:07, 1 July 2013 (UTC)is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:06, 19 July 2013 (UTC)The Help Project Newsletter
Issue VII - August 2013
Hello from Hong Kong, and the Wikimania DevCamp! Just a quick bulletin to update everyone on recent goings-on:
Suggestions for future issues are welcome at Wikipedia:Help Project/Newsletter.
If you don't wish to receive this newsletter on your talk page in future then just edit the participants page and add "no newsletter" next to your name.
-- EdwardsBot (talk) 06:16, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:09, 8 August 2013 (UTC)is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:09, 27 August 2013 (UTC)is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:10, 21 September 2013 (UTC)Would you be interested in working together in creating a real-working main page redesign based on your design and my framework? You design stood out in the redesign RFCs as the only viable option. In case you haven't been following the (lack of) progress, see Wikipedia talk:2013 main page redesign proposal#Next phase: Design criteria and guidelines and Talk:Main Page#Main page redesign. Discussion seems to stall every time, and I'm running out of ideas. If we could present a working example, then maybe the community could be swayed into accepting some much needed change! — Edokter (talk) — 20:16, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:38, 8 October 2013 (UTC)is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:38, 22 October 2013 (UTC)is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:43, 5 November 2013 (UTC)is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:43, 5 November 2013 (UTC)is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:42, 26 November 2013 (UTC)is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:43, 22 December 2013 (UTC)is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:44, 12 January 2014 (UTC)is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:46, 2 February 2014 (UTC)You will be imprisoned for contributing your time and skill to a bank robbery.
Motto of the Day (WP:MOTD) is in a state of emergency and really needs your help! There are not enough editors who are reviewing or nominating mottos at Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/In review, and this probably means that you will notice a red link or “This space for rent” as our mottos for the next weeks and months.
Please take a moment to review the nominations and nominate your own new mottos at Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/In review and Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/'Specials. Any help would be appreciated! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Gold GRIFF without background.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:35, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Bath Chronicle cover July 22 2010.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:53, 29 October 2014 (UTC)