Welcome Pleasureme23!

Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:04, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Corn & Peg, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 00:53, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Overkill (Men at Work song), have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. SummerPhD^v2.0 17:33, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Santa Monica High School, you may be blocked from editing. TJRC (talk) 17:40, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Desert Hills High School (Arizona). ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:07, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:17, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your additions. Please have a look at WP:INTREF for a tutorial. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:18, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Homestead High School (Cupertino, California). Magnolia677 (talk) 18:32, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing from certain namespaces ((Article)) for a period of 36 hours for unsourced edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).   --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:08, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Wikipedia's hallmark is its user-generated, consensus-based content. Most article updates are uncontroversial, so discussion isn't needed. In cases of disagreements amongst editors, though, there is no choice but to communicate with others. ... If you are changing content (and not simply reverting vandalism) and someone reverts you, you should start a discussion on the talk page if you want to restore your change, following our Bold, Revert, Discuss (BRD) cycle. ... If you are getting multiple complaints on your talk page or on an article talk page about your editing, you are expected to either stop the action that is causing the complaints, or discuss it with the community of editors at the appropriate venue. This could be a formal noticeboard, an article talk page, or on your talk page. Ignoring the complaints is not an option and trying to 'fly under the radar' may eventually result in a block." --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:14, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Corn & Peg, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 21:44, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Jxdn, you may be blocked from editing.

CAMERAwMUSTACHE (talk) 18:33, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your recent edit to Geneva High School (New York) appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Meters (talk) 20:02, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Gym Class Heroes. Meters (talk) 20:04, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your recent edit to Colleyville Heritage High School appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. You added a band rather than an individual to the list of notable alumni. Bands are not alumni so I reverted your edit. Notable band members who are alumni could be added to the list. Gab4gab (talk) 10:29, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Iann Dior. CAMERAwMUSTACHE (talk) 14:32, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited DigiTour Media, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Paul Zimmer, Jim Chapman and Aaron Carpenter. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Valencia High School (Santa Clarita, California). TJRC (talk) 19:48, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nearly all your edits are unsourced; most recently including St. Joseph's Preparatory School, Wellington C. Mepham High School, and Blountstown High School. You've been warned about this repeatedly for almost a year. You are on your way to getting blocked again. TJRC (talk) 19:50, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And again, PAW Patrol: The Movie, Louis Bell, Horizon High School (Scottsdale, Arizona).

STOP. TJRC (talk) 19:33, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).   —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 02:41, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at PAW Patrol: The Movie, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. This has been the third time you have added such unsourced information to the same article, and despite an editor removing content added by you, you continued added such material. The next time you add such information, add a reliable source supporting it. FloorMadeOuttaFloor ^{(Leave me a message•Changes I have made)} 15:21, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited PAW Patrol: The Movie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kim Roberts.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hope this will give you a lesson to stop edit-warring. Have a nice block! Signed, Dinosaur TrexXX33 (chat?) 19:01, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]