((unblock|My previous account, "Reverend Will B. Dunn," was used by a family member to vandalize Wikipedia and was subsequently blocked. Since that account was created relatively recently, I simply registered a new one, but I am unable to access it because my IP address has been blocked repeatedly even after the username block expired.))
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits, such as those you made to Jew, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Sneaky.... Kimontalk 01:05, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
I've reverted your most recent edit on Giant Squid, because a drawing of Hulk Hogan wrestling a giant squid is not appropriate for an encyclopedia article, e.g. drawings from textbooks are preferable.
If this is from the person who previously used the Will B. Dunn account mentioned above, you should keep a closer watch on this account, since it seems there has been some other vandalism with this account. Gershwinrb 01:26, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalise pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Canada Goose, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Rklawton 18:15, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
You removal of vandalism on predation didn't effectively revert the damage done. If you revert an edit improperly, there is a grave danger that the article will carry on in that state and the vandalism (in this case removal of a large body of text I worked on) will be ignored. Please ensure you revert edits in future, rather than manually removing suspicious lines without checking the edit history. For further help see WP:Vandalism. Thanks, Richard001 00:17, 14 May 2007 (UTC).
|
for the input. --Gokudbzgohan (talk) 22:34, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Could you explain why you removed sourced information regarding his real height? Do you doubt the source? I suggest you also look at his billed height from years ago. [1] Next time please do not remove content without explanation. --Tærkast (Discuss) 13:56, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Scorpion. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 23:05, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rumours of the death of Saddam Hussein is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rumours of the death of Saddam Hussein (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 21:57, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
What? You have not joined the Penguin Cabal? See User:Anomie/Penguin Cabal for the Cabal, or see my user page on the upper right. Join the Cabal now.--DThomsen8 (talk) 14:39, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, PenguinJockey. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)