My account Nosophobia blocked for "being the sock puppet" of a user nicknamed Hadgimarvi. I want to make clear that I have no ties whatsoever with any account by that name . I don't know any person who has an account by that name. No one by that nick uses my internet and I myself do not use anyone's internet other then mine. I do know the person who uses the nickname 'Whatundush'. She is a relative of mine who whenever is at my premises is allowed to have access to the internet via my connection. Several times while at my premises I have seen her browsing the Wikipedia sites. She did talk about "correcting some errors of the articles of her home town." I have never helped her correcting anything and she has never seek my help either. She has never used my computer and I have never used hers. I am not her and she is not me. Last time when visited my premises she told me of being blocked from editing. She told me how a group of editors at Wikipedia wouldn't give any opportunity to the Northern Cypriots to correct or make any additions to some articles regarding Cyprus, which I thought was a bit weird. Since then I have been closely following some Cyprus related articles as well the contributions of the editors who heavily involved in editing those articles. I noticed some activities of those which I thought were not ethical at all. I prepared a report and decided to lodge a complain with the Wikipedia administration. I didn't have a Wikipedia account so before lodging it created one. Apart from lodging my detailed report on the 1st of December 2014 and adding a few more evidences to it on the 2nd of December, I have not actively involved in any other parts of Wikipedia never before. I lodged a report about some editors who were involved in sock puppetry (so I thought I knew what sock puppetry was and and according to my knowledge I also knew that I wasn't one) if I stoop, being a sock, here on this part of the world, internet accounts with a static IP, for "any reason" can be changed within 24 hours just by calling to the IS provider, so I could have done that instead but I would neither act as a sock, nor would change my ip to avoid being blocked. I am not a "sock puppet" and while expecting an investigation about those editors involved in sockpuppetry , and their activities mentioned in my report, I just found out that my report was deleted and I was "blocked for sockpuppetry"... I strongly believe the Wikipedian administrator who blocked me for "sockpuppetry" and deleted my report has made an error. I request my account to be reinvestigated and my report Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TU-nor reopened for investigation. Kind Regards Nosophobia (talk) 09:16, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not buying the "she uses my internet every so often" explanation here. only (talk) 20:13, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

First of all to be able to understand the ties between the family members of Southeastern Europeans, one must be familiar to at least to the cultures of the people of that part of the world. So the conclusion that you reached "she uses my internet every so often" and saying that you are "not buying it" indicates that you fall short of understanding my explanation. Beside that within a period of 5 weeks, she connected to Wikipedia 10 different days only as we can see here and made a total of 13 edits. I can not be sure how many of them are made while she was connected to the internet via my wifi, but even If we assume that she made all of them while at my premises, that is only a total of 10 connections within a period of 5 weeks. I also believe, you are well aware that this person in question connected to Wikipedia only via her mobile device as can be seen here. So I could have said that my wifi was not protected with a password so this person might had connected to my internet while sitting in her car, in the street outside my premises. But that would be a lie. So, instead of you being bias, if you have any evidences/reasons to not to unblocked my account, please do not hesitate explaining them here only any day and time, before or after retiring, but will be appreciated, if you do it before the end of the boxing day. Nosophobia (talk) 07:24, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SPI is not something a genuinely new user happens to stumble across. That a brand-new user as their first edit would independently launch an SPI case against users Whatundush had a dispute with would be remarkable. That a brand-new user as their first edit would independently launch an SPI case against users Whatundush had a dispute with while being linked to Whatundush by technical evidence is literally incredible. See WP:MEAT. Huon (talk) 09:50, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]