After trying about 30 names, I am pooped. Most of the names rejected were claimed to be similar to existing names but not really. Some names that I tried were judged to be promotional but from it. One was Bongo Drums but that is not promotional.
If you would like to have your username changed to "Bongo Drums", you can make a request at the username change page. Conifer (talk) 06:33, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
The article List of airports in the Vatican has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Everymorning (talk) 20:15, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Complaints, you may be blocked from editing. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 17:32, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of airports in the Vatican is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of airports in the Vatican until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 17:35, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Death and state funeral of Jimmy Carter. Since you had some involvement with the Death and state funeral of Jimmy Carter redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 19:36, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at User:No names left!! abcd, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. It's not appropriate nor constructive for you to create a userspace that is a total copy and paste of another Wikipedian - especially if that copy and paste contains badges that show permissions you don't possess. Including adminsitrator badges. Please stop. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 19:49, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
This is not disruptive. I left a disclaimer saying I was working on the page. I was going to go through and remove the boxes that I didn't want, such as the ones you object. Please improve wikipedia by starting a page with all the boxes so people can see it in one place and choose. No names left!! abcd (talk) 21:02, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Do not perform edits that only administrators are to perform. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 21:22, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
STOP HARASSING ME. I DID NOT VANDALIZE. YOU FALSELY ACCUSE ME. IF you are not a vandal, you would edit nicely, like I am adding facts, not harrass people. Please go away. No names left!! abcd (talk) 21:24, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Winkelvi. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Warning is in regard to this edit. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 18:22, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of airports in the Vatican. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Warning is in regard to this edit this edit. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 17:03, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
If I sound excited, I apologize to the world. It was only because of enthusiasm for Wikipedia.
Please do not attack me or try to pick on my edits. Be respect. Be thoughtful. Be considerate. Be mindful that Wikipedia depends on careful thoughts. I have committed no vandalism but fought for careful editing of paragraphs and careful finding of rare references.
No names left!! abcd (talk) 22:47, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Choor monster (talk) 16:33, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as List of airports in the Vatican, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 16:38, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. Floquenbeam (talk) 17:10, 19 August 2015 (UTC)I think Floq meant to use:
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. John Carter (talk) 17:17, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
This is very strange. It is as if you WANT me to get mad and vandalize Wikipedia, Flo. You accuse me of a trolling account only but look and you will find that I think very critically and bring very good points up and only good points.
For example, there was a broken template so I fixed it by creating a missing article (List of airports in Vatican City). The article before that, there was a big and laughable flaw in the President Jimmy Carter article where a totally unrelated thing, family member's pancreatic cancer, was inserted into a paragraph about his liver cancer.
Therefore, if Wikipedia improvement is a goal, you should engage in discussion not indefinite block. Even if you say nicely, "you need to tone it down and maybe don't edit Wikipedia for a short time" this would be productive. Your current way of action is very much a destructive act. In fact, it would be the perfect way to destroy Wikipedia (become an administrator then make people mad...Mad people will think of ways to do bad things).
Please reconsider. As a gesture of good faith, I will not even look at Wikipedia for a week so this is a sign of self block. Thank you.
FYI, Wikipedia does say Asperger's is autism. Under the autism article, it says in the first paragraph that it is one of the psychiatric diagnosis in the international classification. Who knows, Wikipedia is wrong? I don't think so.
No names left!! abcd (talk) 17:23, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
The ball is in Wikipedia's court....be cruel or be normal. It is up to them (and you, reading this). No names left!! abcd (talk) 20:00, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
"Official" unblock request has been declined. Your comments here give me no confidence that will will cease disruption. Chillum 21:15, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
I will not be considering this issue further as I am sure you desire a fresh opinion. I recommend you use the unblock template: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
to get further attention, anything less leaves you with the risk of being unnoticed. Chillum 22:20, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
No names left!! abcd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Your reason here I am so sorry. I have taken the bait of bullies. I should have been smarter. If unblocked, it will show you are reasonable. In return, I will show you and will, after 30 days, check in with you to provide evidence that I have edited well. I brought to Wikipedia some great ideas. For example, the Jimmy Carter article is high profile. Someone wrote about his liver cancer but then put an unrelated statement that his family has quite a bit pancreatic cancer. This is loose association with no evidence of being related. I opined that pancreatic cancer should be a separate paragraph......... I also saw a template of List of Airports in Europe, which listed all the countries. I did not see a Vatican one, but I also saw a Monserrat one, a country with only one airport. This is valuable...... I was also followed and stalked by an administrator who reverted some really good editions. He reverted everything I did so it was just poorly thought out or plain mean. For example, there was a foundation trust article with no inkling of what country it was. I inserted this info. I did make the mistake of referring to Asperger's Syndrome as mental illness and for that I am sorry. It IS a mental illness per Wikipedia (Asperger's article lists it as an autism spectrum and autism article says in the first paragraph that it is in the classification of psychiatric disorders. That doesn't mean someone is crazy, as I stated.......... I also got a little mad when someone reported me to ANI but did not even tell me, which is a crime on their part. Now I am a bigger person and will not be egged on by others. In short, I am very sorry. I ask that my ban be reduced from permanent to a day. After that, I will edit no more than 1 edit per day for several days and report to you my good progress of thoughtful edits after 1 month. I promise not to be egged into a fight from now on. Please find it in your heart not to be cruel as many internet people are. Thank you. No names left!! abcd (talk) 23:57, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Checkuser evidence confirms that you have abused multiple accounts. Mike V • Talk 00:10, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect List of airports in the Vatican and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 17#List of airports in the Vatican until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. BD2412 T 04:48, 17 July 2022 (UTC)