|
You may also be interested in joining wikiproject professional wrestling. I hope you like it here, and decide to stay! Bmg916Speak 20:44, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Jon Heidenreich. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —BoL 01:26, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from bolding current them music, ringnames, etc. etc. in professional wrestling articles. These are not supposed to be bolded per the Wikipedia Manual of Style at MOS:BOLD. I know that some wrestling articles have bolding, but WP:PW is slowly but surely correcting this error, and we would appreciate your help. Thanks. Nikki311 22:12, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Shawn Michaels, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 03:19, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Please do not remove titles from a wrestlers page, like you did to Jon Heidenreich. Also, please understand that we list wrestling organizations in alphabetical order, and do not show favoritism by one you may consider more major. If you would like to get more involved with wrestling articles on wikipedia you may wish to consdier checking out Wikipedia Project Pro Wrestling. LessThanClippers 19:58, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from List of World Heavyweight Champions (WWE). When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sortable tables need to have entries linked everyime per WP:OVERLINK SRX 18:38, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. I just wanted to let you know that championships/titles should not be added to an article about a tag team, unless the titles were won while they were actively teaming together. Say for example, your recent edits to the Hardy Boyz. The Hardys weren't teaming full-time when Matt won the ECW Championship or the WWE United States Championship, so it doesn't go in the Hardy Boyz article, because it isn't relevant to that article. His individual one, yes certainly, but not the team one. The same goes for Jeff's WWE Intercontinental Championship reigns. Apart from his first, the other three don't pertain to the article, because he didn't win them while they were teaming togther. Please bear this in mind in your future edits. Thanks, ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 19:47, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. Just a quick note to let you know that it has now been decided by consensus at WP:PW to not add notes such as "most wins/reigns"/"longest"/"shortest"/etc to articles in the championships and accomplishments section, as you did here. The discussion can be found here. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 18:11, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Stop or I'll report. RandySavageFTW (talk) 01:21, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
You've been shown the discussion on removing these sorts of edits, so why do you continue to add them? At this point, since you have been warned multiple times, your editing is becoming disruptive—going against consensus without explanation. If you like, you could comment, and we can talk it out, but blatantly ignoring the help of others will get you blocked. Nikki♥311 19:26, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Hello, I think the word you're looking for (when describing a list of a character's appearances) is Bibliography, rather than Biography, which is something totally different. 204.153.84.10 (talk) 14:50, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Please note that trivia sections (or "notes", as you've been calling them) are unnecessary and almost always a violation of WP:TRIVIA. Thanks, GaryColemanFan (talk) 20:55, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Nick. Thanks for your contributions to WikiProject Comics. Just a quick note that our MOS for the first volume of a comic-book series is not to use the phrase "vol. 1" when giving issue ranges. So, for examples, we'd say Agents of Atlas #1-6 (Oct. 2006 - March 2007) and Agents of Atlas vol. 2, #1-11 (April 2009 - Feb. 2010). Lowercase "v" in "vol." Thanks! -- Tenebrae (talk) 06:51, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
A discussion concerning some editing issues involving you is taking place at the WikiProject Comics talk page. We invite you to join the discussion. -- Tenebrae (talk) 03:50, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
((unblock|Your reason here))
below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Per this discussion at WP:ANI, I have blocked this account for 48 hours. You are editing against the established consensus at the article page, and have ignored every attempt to discuss the issue and all requests to cease your actions. Should you open a discussion at this page to discuss your edits then, as long as there appears to be some progress, you may be unblocked without further reference to me. However, if you wait out the block and then recommence the same type of edits then I strongly suggest that you are blocked indefinitely - indefinite being for as long as you are not willing to act within WP's ethos and policies. Your choice. LessHeard vanU (talk) 13:54, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
((unblock|Your reason here))
below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. And to add a little bit of a finer point on this:
Please consider all of this for when you return to editing in 2 and a half days. Continuing to edit as you have been will result in you being blocked again for a longer duration. Continued use of your current editing methods can result in your being blocked indefinitely.
- J Greb (talk) 00:38, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
((unblock|Your reason here))
below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. I would encourage you to cease adding these list sections to articles without further discussion. Thank you. BOZ (talk) 11:54, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
NickLenz19 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
so that I can Fix somthing that some one scrwed up
Decline reason:
I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Tim Song (talk) 02:32, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
((unblock|Your reason here))
below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Tim Song (talk) 18:23, 9 May 2010 (UTC)