This is Mrwikidor's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Hi Mrwikidor. Thank you for your work on patrolling new pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I'm just letting you know that I declined your deletion request for 2013 Canning riots, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to look at the suggested tasks for patrollers and review the criteria for speedy deletion. Particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion, proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. Specifically, the article at least appears to be well-referenced. I checked one or two of those references and they appear to support the article's claims. Therefore, even if you are correct this is not a simple case of a hoax that is so obvious it could be considered vandalism and so it is not a suitable candidate for speedy deletion. If you are certain it is a hoax I would suggest nominating it at WP:AFD. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:02, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Please stop your Canvassing.--Kathovo talk 16:58, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
One more reply at my talk page! --Tito Dutta (contact) 17:43, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Your most recent edits to multiple articles raise several questions concerning your level of knowledge of and/or adherence to conventional wikipedia rules and policies concerning neutral editing. Some of them are listed below
I understand that you object to the wording of some of these article as they seem non-neutral to you. Having such concerns is perfectly acceptable, and resolving them in the proper way is laudatory. However, I strongly encourage you to do so by raising the issues in the talk page, as well as using means like Wikipedia:Requests for comment to get attention from a broader audience. I strongly recommend the latter as it has helped me fix many hitherto biased articles on wikipedia. Your edit patterns, as they currently stand, are highly disruptive and, if unchecked, may require administrator intervention.Handyunits (talk) 05:40, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
I went over the article and I cannot comment on its credibility. In past, I usually avoid such articles where people may have drastically different beliefs because these articles can be spun into a very biased manner while following the wiki guidelines in letter, but not in spirit. So stupid and pointless edit wars ensue which will waste your efforts to keep the article neutral. Anyway, I will try to find time for if i can to make any contribs. — Hamza [ talk ] 12:34, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Mrwikidor,
Would you take a look at your nomination of Dainik Jugasankha for deletion. I found that you caught an important error that is subtle! The transliteration that you nominated was not the best and the new transliteration used here does bring up better search results. See if you agree! Thanks for bringing this to everybody's attention because it probably wouldn't have been caught soon. Best, Crtew (talk) 00:25, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bagber massacre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bengali (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 21:23, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
I've just noticed you don't have a link to your talk page in your sig: could you please fix this? Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 08:30, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Logo of tawkon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 26 August 2021 (UTC)