Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Mjxst! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \bexample\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 19:43, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article Michael Smith-Taylor has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 21:53, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced trivia or speculative information to biographies. Please read our policy on Biographies of Living Persons before you contribute anything else. Thank you. Bastiq▼e ^demandez 15:32, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This reads OK, but every factual statement, even apparently innocuous ones, needs a reference to a checkable source for it - the living biographies policy is strict with good reason.

If you find reference syntax confusing for wikitext (I know I did at first), ask and I'll be glad to help as needed. Main thing is to put the references in - tidying them up can be done after that - David Gerard 16:29, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but your continued "work" on Lucy Noland just earned you a one week wiki-vacation. Please resist the temptation to simply reinsert what you previously had put in the article without following the advices above, and on the talk page.--Brad Patrick 15:13, 28 February 2007 (UTC)-[reply]

You can not under any circumstance add uncited information to people's articles. -- Zanimum 16:13, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Mike Wood, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add ((hangon)) on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Awadewit | talk 15:25, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tracy Humphrey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tracy Humphrey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

schetm (talk) 03:24, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]